NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Katharine Gallon – 10 October 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Katharine Gallon
TUGUN QLD 4224
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1).
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 10 October 2025
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring the protection of members’ interests and the proper administration of superannuation funds. The legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation in the superannuation sector to prevent mismanagement and protect the financial security of superannuation fund members. The Act was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and aims to provide a robust framework for the supervision of superannuation entities and their trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by imposing stringent requirements on the governance, administration, and management of superannuation funds, and by establishing a clear framework for the disqualification of individuals who fail to comply with these requirements.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds in Australia. This includes trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, as well as body corporates that assume such roles. The Act extends its jurisdiction across the Commonwealth of Australia, thereby affecting all states and territories. The SISA's scope is comprehensive, targeting conduct and transactions associated with the administration of superannuation funds. Notably, the Act allows for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Katharine Gallon. The disqualification prohibits the disqualified person from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry, with severe penalties for non-compliance, including a maximum of two years in jail. The Act also provides for the potential revocation of such disqualifications and outlines the process for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this notice pertain to the disqualification of individuals from participating in the administration of superannuation entities. Specifically, subsection 126A(1) empowers the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person if they are satisfied that the individual has contravened the SISA and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions warrant such action. The disqualification notice itself is issued under subsection 126A(6), which mandates the formal notification of the disqualified person, outlining the grounds and the effective date of the disqualification.
The SISA imposes several obligations on parties involved with superannuation entities, particularly trustees, investment managers, and custodians. Those disqualified under the Act are prohibited from acting in any capacity that involves the management or administration of superannuation funds. This includes roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as well as being a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that holds such roles. Failure to comply with these prohibitions can lead to severe consequences.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA by acting in a disqualified capacity is an offence under section 126K, with significant penalties. A disqualified person knowingly acting in any restricted role faces the prospect of imprisonment for up to two years. This serves as a deterrent against non-compliance and underscores the seriousness of the statutory obligations under the SISA. Furthermore, the disqualification can be revoked either by the delegate on their own initiative or following a written application by the disqualified person, as permitted under subsection 126A(5). This provides a pathway for the disqualified individual to seek reinstatement, contingent on meeting specific conditions.
Additionally, section 344 of the SISA offers recourse for those dissatisfied with the disqualification decision. Affected individuals have the right to request a reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should include the reasons why the individual believes the decision is incorrect. This mechanism ensures that the decision-making process includes an opportunity for review and potential rectification, thereby safeguarding the rights of the individuals involved.