NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Karolina Kalinovski
BANKSIA NSW 2216
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 20 February 2013
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to regulate the operations of superannuation funds, including ensuring the proper management and administration of these funds. This Act was introduced to address the need for a robust regulatory framework to protect the interests of superannuation fund members, thereby ensuring the integrity and sustainability of the superannuation system. The SIS Act is overseen by the Australian Parliament, with the objective of maintaining high standards of conduct and governance within the superannuation industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have breached the provisions of the Act from acting as trustees or responsible officers of entities involved in managing superannuation funds, thus ensuring accountability and safeguarding the interests of fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to persons who serve as trustees, responsible officers, or in similar roles within entities that manage, invest, or safeguard superannuation funds. These entities include trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation funds, and the Act encompasses individuals who hold or have held positions of responsibility within these entities. The SIS Act has a national jurisdictional reach, applying across Australia, thereby impacting entities and individuals within the superannuation industry nationwide. However, the Act may exclude certain entities or conduct based on specific criteria, such as those that fall under particular thresholds or exemptions prescribed by the legislation or by subordinate instruments. These subordinate instruments can extend or restrict the application of the Act by providing additional rules or guidelines. In this instance, Mrs Karolina Kalinovski has been disqualified from serving as a trustee or a responsible officer due to contraventions of the SIS Act, as determined by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. The disqualification order, effective immediately, mandates that Mrs Kalinovski ceases to hold any such positions within entities managing superannuation funds.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) includes specific provisions for disqualifying individuals from holding positions of trust or responsibility within superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(6), the Commissioner of Taxation can delegate the authority to disqualify individuals, as demonstrated in the case of Mrs Karolina Kalinovski, where Ivan Parrett, as a delegate, issued the notice of disqualification. The decision to disqualify Mrs Kalinovski was made under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act, which allows for such action if the delegate is satisfied that she has contravened the SIS Act multiple times in a manner that justifies her disqualification.
The disqualification order imposes a significant restriction on Mrs Kalinovski's professional capabilities within the superannuation industry, prohibiting her from acting as a trustee or a responsible officer of any body corporate that functions as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian for a superannuation entity. This restriction is effective from the date the notice is issued, as stated in the notice dated 20 February 2013. Furthermore, the notice includes provisions for the publication of the disqualification details in the Gazette as per subsection 126A(7), and also outlines the possibility of revocation of the disqualification order either by the delegate on their own initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified individual as per subsection 126A(5).
In terms of obligations, the Act requires that any person who has contravened the SIS Act and is subsequently disqualified must comply with the terms of the disqualification. Mrs Kalinovski is required to refrain from engaging in any activities that involve trusteeship or management within superannuation entities. The Act also provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the disqualification decision. According to section 344, Mrs Kalinovski has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided she submits a written request that includes the reasons for her dissatisfaction with the decision.
The SIS Act outlines potential consequences for non-compliance with the disqualification order. While the notice does not specify exact penalties for breaches, it is implied that failure to adhere to the disqualification could lead to further legal actions or penalties under the Act. The precise nature of these penalties would be determined in the context of any subsequent legal proceedings related to the contravention of the disqualification order.