NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Karen Ingram
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Karen Ingram
ERINA NSW 2250
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 17 August 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address the need for stringent regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry. This legislation aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities comply with rigorous standards and regulations. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry if they are found to have acted in a manner that contravenes the provisions of the Act, thereby safeguarding the financial security and retirement prospects of superannuation fund members. The disqualification of Karen Ingram under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA exemplifies the Act's objective to maintain the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system by removing individuals who have demonstrated serious misconduct from positions of responsibility within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to the trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, as well as the entities themselves. It operates on a national level across Australia, ensuring that superannuation funds are managed in compliance with the law. The Act primarily targets the superannuation industry, overseeing the conduct of entities and individuals involved in the administration of superannuation funds to protect the interests of fund members. The Act’s reach is extensive, covering all trustees, custodians, and investment managers within the superannuation industry, regardless of where they are located within Australia. However, the Act also allows for certain exclusions or exemptions through subordinate instruments, although specific details are not provided in the notice. Additionally, the notice informs that the disqualification of a responsible officer such as Karen Ingram is a serious matter, with potential criminal penalties for continued involvement in contraventions of the Act, highlighting the stringent measures in place to enforce compliance within the superannuation sector.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification provided to Karen Ingram under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) (section 126A(6)) details that she has been disqualified from acting in a responsible capacity in relation to superannuation entities. This disqualification arises due to the corporate trustee, of which she was a responsible officer, contravening the SISA on multiple occasions. The disqualification is based on the seriousness of these contraventions, which provide sufficient grounds for such a measure (subsection 126A(2)). The disqualification becomes effective immediately upon issuance of the notice (subsection 126A(6)).
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals such as Karen Ingram who are responsible officers of corporate trustees. These include ensuring compliance with the SISA to prevent any contraventions that could lead to disqualification. Should a contravention occur, the responsible officer must take all necessary steps to rectify the situation and prevent future occurrences. Failure to do so may result in the Commissioner of Taxation taking action, including disqualification, to protect the interests of superannuation fund members.
Breaching the terms of this disqualification by acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles, is a serious offence under section 126K of the SISA. A person who knowingly contravenes this provision can face severe penalties, including up to two years in jail (section 126K). Additionally, the disqualification details will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as per subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, further publicising the individual's disqualified status.
Karen Ingram has the right to seek reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing to the Commissioner and should outline the reasons why she believes the decision is incorrect (section 344). Furthermore, the disqualification may be revoked either by the Commissioner on their own initiative or upon a written application from Karen Ingram, as provided under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA.