NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – KARAN VEER SINGH
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Karan Veer Singh
CLYDE NORTH VIC 3978
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 2 February 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Rachael Anderson
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust supervision and regulation within the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the industry's integrity and proper administration. The Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament to provide a comprehensive framework for the supervision and regulation of superannuation entities, trustees, and responsible officers. Its primary policy objective is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by preventing and addressing misconduct, incompetence, or breaches of the law within the superannuation industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have acted in a manner that warrants such action, thereby ensuring that the administration of superannuation funds remains in capable and trustworthy hands.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities within the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. This Act is of Commonwealth jurisdiction and governs the conduct of those involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities to ensure compliance with regulatory standards. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments to provide detailed rules and regulations that further define the scope of its provisions. In the case of Karan Veer Singh, the Act has been applied to disqualify him from participating in the superannuation industry due to his role as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the Act. The disqualification notice, issued under the authority of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, highlights the seriousness of the contraventions and the consequences of such actions under the Act. Furthermore, the Act stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue to act in a role within the superannuation industry, with significant penalties, including up to two years in jail, for those who contravene this provision. The Act also provides avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of the disqualification, should the circumstances warrant such action.
Key Provisions
The notice provided to Karan Veer Singh under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs him that he has been disqualified from holding certain roles within superannuation entities due to contraventions by the corporate trustee, for which he was a responsible officer. This disqualification arises from the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation being satisfied that the contraventions were serious enough to warrant such action. The disqualification is effective from the date the notice is issued, which in this case is 2 February 2023.
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 imposes several obligations on responsible officers of corporate trustees. These include adhering to the legislative requirements to ensure the proper management and administration of superannuation entities. When a responsible officer is found to have contravened these requirements, it may result in their disqualification, as outlined in the notice to Karan Veer Singh. This disqualification is a significant administrative action intended to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members.
The Act also establishes specific offences and penalties for disqualified persons. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness of the contraventions that led to the disqualification.
Additionally, there are provisions for the potential revocation of the disqualification. According to subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA allows for reconsideration of the decision if the affected person is dissatisfied with it, provided the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and includes the reasons for dissatisfaction. This mechanism ensures that there is a formal process for reviewing and potentially overturning the disqualification if new evidence or circumstances come to light.