NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – JUSTIN DEAN - 15 May 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
JUSTIN DEAN
BRIDGEMAN DOWNS QLD 4035
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 15 May 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation entities are managed properly and in the best interests of members. This legislation was introduced to address the need for stricter oversight and regulation of superannuation funds to protect the retirement savings of Australians. The policy objective of the SISA is to provide a robust framework for the supervision and regulation of superannuation entities, thereby safeguarding the interests of superannuation members. Under this Act, the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify individuals from being responsible officers if there are serious contraventions of the Act by the entities they oversee.
This notifiable instrument serves as official notice to Justin Dean that he has been disqualified as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities due to contraventions of the SISA. The disqualification is effective from the date of notice and includes potential criminal penalties for acting in the prohibited roles post-disqualification. Additionally, the Commissioner has the authority to revoke the disqualification under certain conditions, and affected individuals have the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving notice.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees involved in the administration of superannuation entities within Australia. This Act is a Commonwealth statute and its provisions are applicable nationally, ensuring uniformity in the regulation of superannuation trustees. The Act specifically targets individuals who have contravened its provisions while serving as responsible officers, leading to potential disqualification from managing superannuation entities. The Act also stipulates that details of such disqualifications will be published as Notifiable Instruments in the Federal Register of Legislation, thereby maintaining transparency. Furthermore, the Act provides for the possibility of disqualification revocation either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified person, and offers recourse for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected individual is dissatisfied with the outcome. Notably, the Act criminalises the act of a disqualified person continuing to serve in roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with penalties including up to two years of imprisonment.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) serves to inform Justin Dean that he has been disqualified from performing certain roles in relation to superannuation entities. This disqualification is due to the satisfaction of the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has breached the SISA on one or more occasions while Justin Dean was a responsible officer, and the seriousness of these breaches justifies his disqualification (subsection 126A(2)). This disqualification takes immediate effect upon its issuance.
Under the SISA, the disqualification imposes strict obligations on Justin Dean, prohibiting him from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or from being a responsible officer of such a corporate entity (section 126K). The notice explicitly outlines that any contravention of these provisions knowingly by a disqualified person is an offence, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment (subsection 126A(7)). Additionally, the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application by Justin Dean himself (subsection 126A(5)). Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides a recourse for Justin Dean, allowing him to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice if he is dissatisfied with the outcome. This request must be made in writing and should detail the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect.