NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Juliet Enriquez - 28 May 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Juliet Enriquez
ALLAMBIE HEIGHTS NSW 2100
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 28 May 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and the rights of fund members. The SISA establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework to govern the operations of superannuation entities and their officers, aiming to maintain high standards of conduct and accountability within the industry. The SISA is administered by the Australian Taxation Office, acting on behalf of the Commissioner of Taxation, who has the authority to disqualify individuals from managing superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the Act's provisions. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the financial interests of superannuation fund members by promoting transparency, efficiency, and integrity in the management of superannuation entities. This is achieved through stringent oversight, enforcement actions, and the ability to disqualify individuals who fail to meet the required standards of conduct.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to the trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities in Australia. This legislation has a national reach and is enforced by the Commissioner of Taxation, with the authority to disqualify individuals who have acted in a manner that contravenes the Act, particularly when such actions are serious enough to warrant disqualification. The Act also provides for the publication of disqualification notices, as seen in the case of Juliet Enriquez, which informs the public of the disqualification. Additionally, the Act includes provisions for the revocation of disqualifications and offers a mechanism for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, which detail the processes for disqualification, publication, and potential revocation, thereby ensuring comprehensive oversight and enforcement of the Act's provisions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to hold certain positions within the superannuation industry. Specifically, under section 126A, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify a person if they have been a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that has contravened the SISA, and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies the disqualification. This is precisely what occurred in the case of Juliet Enriquez, who was disqualified under subsection 126A(2) by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. This disqualification notice, dated 28 May 2025, asserts that Juliet was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions and that the seriousness of these breaches warranted her disqualification.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on parties such as Juliet Enriquez include adherence to the regulations governing superannuation entities. If a corporate trustee, of which the disqualified individual was a responsible officer, breaches the SISA, the disqualified individual must be aware of their responsibilities to prevent such breaches. They must ensure compliance with all relevant provisions to avoid the potential for disqualification. The Act also mandates that once a disqualification notice is issued, the details must be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation (subsection 126A(7)).
The Act further outlines the consequences of breaching the disqualification provisions. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as, or be, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such a role. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty reflects the seriousness with which the legislation treats breaches of disqualification orders.
Additionally, the SISA provides avenues for review and potential revocation of disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. For those affected by the disqualification decision and dissatisfied with it, section 344 allows for a request for reconsideration to be made to the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision, provided the request is in writing and includes the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect.