Notice of Disqualification – Julie Barkman - 25 September 2024

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2024N00876 In force Notifiable Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Julie Barkman - 25 September 2024

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

 

To:

 

Julie Barkman

 

OATLEY NSW 2223

 

I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.

 

I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature, number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 25 September 2024

 

 

Emma Rosenzweig

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

Per Jenny McGuire


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

    trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for comprehensive regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that superannuation entities are managed with integrity and in the best interest of the members. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament with the policy objective of safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians by imposing stringent compliance and governance standards on superannuation trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act aims to prevent misconduct and breaches of fiduciary duty by these entities, thereby protecting the financial security of superannuation members. One of the mechanisms introduced under the SISA to achieve this objective is the power to disqualify responsible officers who have been involved in the contravention of the Act's provisions, as evidenced in the notice of disqualification issued to Julie Barkman.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with legislative and regulatory standards in the management of superannuation funds. This Act targets individuals who hold significant responsibility within these entities, imposing a duty of care and governance that, when breached, can result in disqualification. The geographic reach of the Act extends across Australia, as it is a Commonwealth Act, applying uniformly throughout the nation. However, the Act can be enforced through subordinate instruments, allowing for specific regulations and guidelines that may further define its application and scope. There are no explicit exclusions or exemptions stated in the provided excerpt; however, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualifications under certain conditions, providing a degree of flexibility in its application. This legislative framework aims to maintain the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation industry by holding accountable those who fail to meet the required standards of conduct and compliance.

Key Provisions

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains several key sections relevant to the disqualification of individuals from participating in the administration of superannuation entities. In this case, subsection 126A(6) of the Act mandates that a notice of disqualification be issued to the affected individual, Julie Barkman, indicating that she has been disqualified by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. This disqualification occurs under subsection 126A(2) of the Act, based on the determination that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the Act on multiple occasions while Julie Barkman was a responsible officer. The nature, number, and seriousness of these contraventions provide sufficient grounds for the disqualification. The disqualification is effective immediately from the date of issuance of the notice. Under the SISA, Julie Barkman and any other disqualified person are subject to specific obligations and restrictions. For instance, section 126K of the Act imposes a prohibition on disqualified persons from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, or being responsible officers or part of a body corporate that serves in these roles. The intent behind these provisions is to ensure the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds by preventing individuals with a history of regulatory breaches from participating in the administration of these entities. Failure to comply with these restrictions can lead to serious legal consequences. The SISA also delineates clear penalties and consequences for breaches of its provisions. Specifically, section 126K makes it an offence for a disqualified person to act in the prohibited capacities while knowing they are disqualified. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is set at two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act regards such violations. This deterrent is designed to maintain the standards and compliance within the superannuation industry. Furthermore, the Act allows for the possibility of disqualification revocation under subsection 126A(5), either at the initiative of the authorities or upon written application by the disqualified individual. Lastly, the Act provides a recourse mechanism for individuals who believe their disqualification is unjust. Section 344 of the SISA allows an affected person to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and must outline the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the decision, providing an opportunity for the disqualified person to present their case and potentially have the disqualification overturned if the Commissioner finds merit in their arguments.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Superannuation Law
Instrument
Notifiable Instrument
Concepts
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers
Disqualification

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.