NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
JUGKREE SITHISEN
EDMONDSON PARK NSW 2174
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 21 January 2021
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pamela Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for better regulation and supervision of superannuation entities to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to establish a framework that ensures the proper management and administration of superannuation funds, safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry by imposing obligations on trustees, investment managers, and custodians, and by providing mechanisms for the supervision and enforcement of compliance with these obligations.
This particular notice of disqualification under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA highlights the enforcement powers available to the Commissioner of Taxation to prevent and rectify breaches of the Act. The notice informs the individual, Jugkree Sithisen, that they have been disqualified from acting in certain capacities related to superannuation entities due to the contraventions committed by the corporate trustee of which they were a responsible officer at the time. The notice also provides information on the potential legal consequences of acting while disqualified, as well as the avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of the disqualification. The publication of such notices in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette serves to inform the public and deter potential breaches of the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds in Australia, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. The Act extends to the entire Commonwealth, thereby imposing a national standard for the supervision of superannuation entities. It specifically targets those who have been found to contravene the provisions of the SISA, and the disqualification of responsible officers serves as a regulatory measure to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry. This Act does not specify exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the text provided, but it is understood that its application can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, allowing for more detailed regulations or specific conditions under which the Act operates. The disqualification of an individual, such as Jugkree Sithisen in the given notice, is a direct application of the Act's provisions, illustrating the seriousness with which breaches of superannuation laws are treated.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a pivotal piece of legislation designed to regulate the operations of superannuation entities and ensure the protection of superannuation funds. Under section 126A, the Act empowers a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who, while serving as responsible officers of a corporate trustee, have been involved in the contravention of the SISA. Section 126A(2) outlines the circumstances under which such disqualification may occur, namely when there is evidence of serious contraventions by the corporate trustee and the individual was a responsible officer at the time of these contraventions.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties it governs are stringent. Trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities must comply with the various provisions of the SISA, including, but not limited to, the fiduciary duties and obligations to act in the best interests of the members of the superannuation fund. Responsible officers, in particular, bear a heightened responsibility to ensure adherence to these obligations. Failure to do so can lead to personal disqualification, as highlighted in the notice to Jugkree Sithisen.
The SISA also establishes clear consequences for breaches of its provisions. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be associated with a body corporate that holds such roles. The penalty for this offence is significant, with a maximum sentence of two years imprisonment. This underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its provisions. Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for reconsideration of decisions, as outlined in section 344, allowing affected individuals to seek a review of the decision within 21 days of receiving notice.