NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - JOSIP BARISIC - 30 April 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Josip Barisic
NELSON BAY NSW 2315
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 30 April 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Narinder Singh
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to ensure the integrity, efficiency, and sustainability of superannuation arrangements, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation members and beneficiaries. The legislation established a framework for the regulation of superannuation funds and their trustees, aiming to prevent misconduct and ensure compliance with statutory obligations. The policy objective was to maintain the confidence of the public and participants in the superannuation system by imposing stringent regulatory requirements on trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities. Enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, the Act has been a cornerstone in the regulation of the superannuation industry, providing the necessary mechanisms to oversee and enforce compliance with its provisions.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals who are responsible officers of corporate trustees that manage superannuation entities, as well as to corporate trustees themselves. The Act's jurisdiction is national, operating across the Commonwealth of Australia and impacting all states and territories. The scope of the Act includes the conduct and transactions of these entities and officers, ensuring compliance with the regulatory framework designed to protect superannuation funds. In the case of Josip Barisic, his disqualification is a direct consequence of the corporate trustee's contraventions of the SISA, highlighting the Act's enforcement mechanisms. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals found to be responsible for repeated contraventions, thereby maintaining the integrity of the superannuation industry. Exclusions or exemptions are not detailed in this particular notice, although the Act generally includes provisions that may exclude certain entities or activities under specific circumstances. The application of the Act can be further defined and extended through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or legislative rules, which provide additional clarity and detail to the primary legislation.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides several operative sections relevant to the notice of disqualification issued to Josip Barisic. Under subsection 126A(2) of the Act, the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, in this case Emma Rosenzweig, has disqualified Josip Barisic from being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities. This disqualification was made due to a satisfaction that the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA on multiple occasions while Josip Barisic was a responsible officer (subsection 126A(6)). The disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice (subsection 126A(7)).
The SISA imposes obligations on individuals and entities involved in superannuation entities, ensuring they adhere to specific regulatory standards. For responsible officers, such as Josip Barisic, this includes compliance with all provisions of the SISA and the maintenance of proper records and reporting as required by the Act. Any contravention of the Act by the corporate trustee while the responsible officer was in place places the officer under scrutiny and potential disqualification.
Breaching the terms of this disqualification can lead to serious legal consequences. According to section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) provides for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person.
For those affected by the disqualification and dissatisfied with the decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. The Commissioner must be requested in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification, outlining the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision. This process allows for a formal review of the disqualification and an opportunity for the affected party to present their case for reconsideration.