Notice of Disqualification - Josephine Bazzo

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au C2020G00932 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

 

To:

 

Josephine Bazzo

 

MANDURAH WA 6210

 

I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.

 

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 20 November 2020

 

 

James O'Halloran

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

Per Valentino Zollo


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

    trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate and oversee the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those who manage these funds do so with integrity and competence. The Act was introduced to address the need for a robust regulatory framework to oversee the management and administration of superannuation funds, ensuring compliance with standards designed to safeguard the financial well-being of participants. The enacting body was the Parliament of Australia, with the policy objective clearly stated as enhancing the accountability and transparency of the superannuation industry. The Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals found to be unfit to manage superannuation funds due to breaches of the Act, as illustrated by the recent notice of disqualification issued to Josephine Bazzo under the authority of the Commissioner of Taxation.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act has a national jurisdictional reach, operating under the Commonwealth of Australia, and it governs conduct and transactions related to superannuation funds throughout the country. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who have contravened its provisions, with the disqualification preventing them from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry. Exclusions, exemptions, or specific thresholds are determined by the Act itself and may be further defined through subordinate instruments or regulations. These instruments can extend or restrict the application of the Act, providing additional guidelines and specific instances where the Act's provisions may be applied or limited.

Key Provisions

The notice issued to Josephine Bazzo under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) states that she has been disqualified from certain roles related to superannuation entities. This disqualification arises from the delegate's satisfaction that Josephine has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, with the seriousness of these contraventions warranting the disqualification. The disqualification takes effect immediately upon the issuance of the notice. This formal notification is a critical step in the regulatory process, ensuring that Josephine is aware of the consequences of her actions and the specific restrictions now placed upon her. The obligations imposed on Josephine by this disqualification are significant. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for Josephine, knowing she is disqualified, to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. Furthermore, she cannot serve as a responsible officer or be part of a body corporate that holds such roles for a superannuation entity. These provisions are designed to maintain the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation industry by preventing disqualified individuals from influencing or managing funds that are critical to the retirement security of many Australians. Failure to adhere to these obligations can result in serious legal consequences. Specifically, if Josephine knowingly contravenes the provisions outlined in section 126K, she commits an offence that can lead to criminal penalties. The maximum penalty for this offence is a two-year jail term, underscoring the gravity of the actions that led to her disqualification and the importance of compliance with the regulatory framework. This serves as a deterrent not only to Josephine but also to other individuals who might consider similar actions. In addition to the immediate penalties, the notice also outlines the possibility of revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. This can occur either on the initiative of the relevant authorities or upon a written application by Josephine herself. The process of reconsideration, as detailed in section 344 of the SISA, allows Josephine to request the Commissioner to review the decision if she believes it to be unjust. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must articulate the reasons for her dissatisfaction with the decision. This mechanism ensures that the process remains fair and provides an avenue for Josephine to seek redress if she has grounds to do so.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Administrative Discretion

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.