NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - JONATHAN SMITH - 31 March 2026
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
JONATHAN SMITH
CARINA QLD 4152
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2).
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 31 March 2026
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that superannuation entities operate in a manner that protects the interests of members. This legislation addresses the problem of inadequate oversight and potential mismanagement within the superannuation industry, aiming to maintain the integrity and reliability of superannuation funds. The Act was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and its policy objective is to safeguard the superannuation savings of Australians by ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities are fit and proper persons. This includes imposing disqualifications on responsible officers who fail to uphold the standards set forth in the Act, as evidenced by the disqualification of Jonathan Smith due to the contravention of the Act by the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, specifically those acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities. This includes responsible officers of corporate trustees and bodies corporate that serve in these roles. The Act's jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, providing a national framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry. However, the Act may include exclusions or exemptions for certain types of superannuation entities or activities as specified within its provisions or through subordinate instruments. Notably, the Act allows for the disqualification of individuals who have been responsible officers at the time of a contravention by a corporate trustee, as evidenced in the notice to Jonathan Smith, which serves as a notifiable instrument under the Act and will be published in the Federal Register of Legislation. The disqualification not only restricts the individual from acting in specified capacities within the superannuation industry but also carries potential criminal penalties for non-compliance.
Key Provisions
The notice provided to Jonathan Smith under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) formally informs him that he has been disqualified from acting in certain capacities due to the misconduct of a corporate trustee for which he was a responsible officer. This disqualification is effective immediately upon the issuance of the notice. The notice cites subsection 126A(2) as the basis for the disqualification, indicating that the breaches were serious enough to warrant this action. Under subsection 126A(7), the details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness of the decision.
The SISA imposes several obligations on the parties it governs, particularly those related to compliance with superannuation laws. For responsible officers like Jonathan Smith, it is crucial to ensure that the corporate trustees adhere to all legal requirements to avoid personal disqualification. Furthermore, section 126K of the SISA prohibits a disqualified person from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of such an entity. This restriction is intended to protect the integrity of the superannuation industry and maintain public trust.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA by acting in a capacity prohibited to a disqualified person is a serious offence. Under section 126K, any such actions are punishable by law, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. This severe penalty underscores the importance of compliance and the potential consequences of disregarding the legal restrictions imposed by the Act. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either at the initiative of the authorities or upon a written application by the disqualified person, providing a potential avenue for reinstatement under certain conditions.
For individuals like Jonathan Smith who are dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, the SISA offers recourse through section 344. This section allows for a request to the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. The request must be in writing and detail the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the disqualification, thereby upholding the principles of natural justice.