NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr John Pender
Dapto NSW 2530
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 8 June 2017
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Mr Michael Lazzaroni
Director
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to regulate and supervise the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing issues such as mismanagement, fraud, and breaches of duty by trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities. This Act provides a framework for the effective supervision of superannuation entities and the protection of superannuation funds. The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia, aiming to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act in their best interests and comply with the relevant laws and regulations. In this context, the Act seeks to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system and ensure that members' funds are managed responsibly and transparently. This disqualification notice, issued under the Act, aims to enforce the legislative provisions that prevent individuals with a history of significant breaches from holding responsible positions within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to the administration and regulation of superannuation entities in Australia, with a primary focus on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of these entities. It encompasses individuals and corporate bodies that are responsible for managing or overseeing superannuation funds, ensuring compliance with the legislative standards designed to protect the interests of fund members. The Act applies on a national level across Australia, covering all jurisdictions, including states and territories, ensuring a consistent regulatory framework for superannuation entities. The SISA does not explicitly outline exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, but it does provide provisions for disqualification of responsible officers in cases of significant contraventions. The scope of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and directions, which may further define specific operational standards or penalties.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides various measures to oversee the supervision of superannuation funds, including provisions for disqualifying individuals from managing such funds. In this case, Mr. John Pender has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA. This disqualification was issued by James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, based on the determination that Mr. Pender was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the SISA. The seriousness of these contraventions warranted the disqualification, which takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice, as stated in subsection 126A(6).
Under the SISA, certain obligations and requirements are placed on the parties governed by the Act. For instance, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with the Act's provisions to avoid personal disqualification. Additionally, section 126K imposes significant obligations on disqualified individuals, such as Mr. Pender, prohibiting them from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, or from being responsible officers of bodies corporate that manage such entities. These provisions are designed to maintain the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds.
Failure to adhere to the obligations and requirements of the SISA can lead to severe consequences. As noted in Note 2, it is an offence under section 126K for a disqualified person to act in any capacity governed by the Act while knowing of their disqualification. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment, as stipulated in the same section. This penalty underscores the seriousness with which the law treats breaches of disqualification orders.
There are also procedural mechanisms available for those affected by disqualification decisions. As per Note 4, if Mr. Pender is unsatisfied with the disqualification, he has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should outline the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or based on a written application by Mr. Pender.