NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - JOHN KOSTOGLOU
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
JOHN KOSTOGLOU
CORNUBIA QLD 4130
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A (6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A (1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 20 April 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Mark Webberley
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A (7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A (5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This Act was introduced to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those who manage these funds do so with integrity and competence. The SISA establishes a framework for the supervision and regulation of superannuation entities and their officers, aiming to maintain public confidence in the superannuation system. The Commonwealth Parliament enacted this legislation to provide the necessary tools for the effective governance and supervision of superannuation entities. The policy objective of the SISA is to protect superannuation fund members by imposing strict requirements on those who manage these funds, thereby ensuring that they act in the best interests of the members at all times. This includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals found to have breached the provisions of the Act, as seen in the notice issued to John Kostoglou.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities within Australia. The Act regulates the conduct of trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations and maintaining the integrity of the superannuation system. This legislation operates at the national level, extending its jurisdiction across the entire Commonwealth of Australia. Exclusions or exemptions from the Act are limited, with most persons and entities within the superannuation industry subject to its provisions. The Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which provide additional regulations and guidelines to ensure comprehensive oversight and enforcement. For instance, specific conditions and standards for superannuation entities are often detailed in regulations that supplement the primary Act. The disqualification of individuals such as John Kostoglou underscores the Act's intent to enforce compliance rigorously, particularly in cases where there is a serious contravention of the Act's provisions.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the notice of disqualification issued under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) pertain to the disqualification of John Kostoglou. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation has formally notified John Kostoglou of his disqualification. This disqualification arises from a determination under subsection 126A(1) that John has contravened the SISA, with the seriousness of the contraventions warranting this action. The disqualification is effective from the date of the notice, which is 20 April 2022. Additionally, the notice informs John that the details of his disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as per subsection 126A(7) of the SISA.
The SISA imposes specific obligations on John Kostoglou as a result of his disqualification. Under section 126K of the Act, it is an offence for John, knowing that he is disqualified, to be or act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. This also applies to his role as a responsible officer or a body corporate associated with such entities. The breach of these obligations carries severe consequences, as outlined in the notice.
Breaching the SISA by acting in any capacity as mentioned above while disqualified results in criminal penalties. Section 126K of the Act stipulates that the maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment. This highlights the seriousness of adhering to the disqualification and avoiding any involvement in the management or administration of superannuation entities. Furthermore, the notice informs John that the disqualification may be revoked either on his own initiative or through a written application, as per subsection 126A(5) of the SISA.
For those who believe the disqualification decision is unjust, section 344 of the SISA provides a recourse. If John is affected by this decision and wishes to contest it, he must submit a written request to the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request should clearly outline the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for reconsideration, aiming to address any perceived unfairness or errors in the initial decision.