NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - JOELY LEIGH BRENNAN
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
JOELY LEIGH BRENNAN
WESTDALE NSW 2340
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 10 January 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pamela Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for the effective regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring it operates in the best interests of the members of superannuation funds. This Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament, aiming to safeguard the financial interests of superannuation fund members by providing a robust regulatory framework. The overarching policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry through stringent oversight and accountability measures. In the case of Joely Leigh Brennan, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation has disqualified her from performing certain roles within superannuation entities due to contraventions of the Act, reflecting the legislation's role in enforcing compliance and penalising misconduct within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision of superannuation funds within Australia, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. This Act extends its jurisdictional reach to the entire Commonwealth of Australia, thereby affecting all persons and entities involved in superannuation activities regardless of their location within the country. The Act specifically targets conduct that contravenes its provisions, with the disqualification of individuals being a significant measure to ensure compliance. Exclusions and exemptions from the application of the SISA are not broadly stated in the text, though certain roles and activities, particularly those involving the management or oversight of superannuation funds, are specifically regulated. The application of the Act can also be extended or modified through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional clarifications or specific provisions pertinent to certain aspects of superannuation management. The serious nature of contraventions under the SISA can lead to disqualification, as evidenced by the notice given to Joely Leigh Brennan, illustrating the stringent measures in place to uphold the integrity of superannuation funds.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this disqualification notice pertain to sections 126A(1), 126A(6), and 126A(7). Under section 126A(1), the Act allows for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions, especially if the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such action. The notice, provided under section 126A(6), informs the disqualified individual, in this case Joely Leigh Brennan, of the decision and its immediate effect. Section 126A(7) mandates the publication of these disqualification details in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs, particularly those involved in superannuation entities. Trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers must adhere strictly to the provisions of the SISA to avoid disqualification. These obligations include maintaining the highest standards of conduct and ensuring compliance with all relevant laws and regulations governing superannuation funds. Failure to comply can lead to serious repercussions, including disqualification as demonstrated in this notice.
The Act also delineates specific offences and their corresponding penalties for breaches. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years in jail, underscoring the gravity with which the Act treats such contraventions. This section serves as a deterrent, ensuring that individuals who are disqualified do not re-enter roles that could compromise the integrity of superannuation funds.
Additionally, the Act provides avenues for appeal and reconsideration. Under section 344, any person affected by the disqualification decision can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be in writing and should detail the reasons why the individual believes the decision is incorrect. Furthermore, the Act allows for the potential revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5), either on the initiative of the authorities or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This provision offers a measure of flexibility and fairness in the enforcement of the Act.