NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Joanne Storie - 21 March 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Joanne Storie
Bundall QLD 4217
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 21 March 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Christiane Boissezon
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to ensure that superannuation trustees and related entities operate with integrity and in the best interests of their members. This Act, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, addresses the gap in the regulation of the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the financial interests of superannuation fund members by establishing a framework for the oversight and supervision of superannuation entities. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain and enhance the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation industry, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. One aspect of this is the power to disqualify individuals who have been responsible officers of corporate trustees that have contravened the Act, as seen in the case of Joanne Storie, who has been disqualified due to the seriousness of the contraventions that occurred while she was in her position.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to various entities and individuals involved in the administration of superannuation funds, including trustees, responsible officers, and corporate trustees. In this case, the Act was invoked to disqualify Joanne Storie from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee, due to serious contraventions of the Act by the corporate trustee entity she was associated with. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act. Exclusions or exemptions from the Act’s application are not detailed in the notice, but the Act does extend its application through subordinate instruments such as regulations and determinations that can provide further clarity and detail. The disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance and is subject to potential revocation under the Act, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon application by the disqualified person.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context include subsections 126A(2) and 126A(6). Under subsection 126A(2), a person can be disqualified from being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of a superannuation entity if there is a contravention of the Act and the seriousness of the contravention warrants such a disqualification. Subsection 126A(6) requires the Commissioner of Taxation to give written notice to the disqualified person, explaining the reasons for the disqualification and the effective date of the disqualification. In this case, Joanne Storie has been disqualified under these provisions.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Firstly, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with all provisions of the SISA. Secondly, upon a determination of contravention, the Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to disqualify individuals from holding responsible positions if the seriousness of the contravention justifies such action. Joanne Storie, as a responsible officer, had the obligation to ensure the corporate trustee's compliance with the Act, and her failure to do so has led to her disqualification.
The Act also delineates serious consequences for breaches of its provisions. Section 126K of the SISA makes it an offence for a disqualified person to act as, or be, a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or body corporate involved with a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, underscoring the gravity with which the Act treats such contraventions. Furthermore, the disqualification notice issued to Joanne Storie will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and accountability.
In the event that Joanne Storie is unsatisfied with the disqualification decision, she has recourse under section 344 of the SISA. This section allows her to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) provides a mechanism for the disqualification to be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by Joanne Storie herself. These provisions ensure that there is a formal process for challenging and potentially reversing the disqualification if new evidence or circumstances arise.