NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Joanne Lumsden
MANNERING PARK NSW 2259
I, James O’Halloran a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 November 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Leanne McLean
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent regulation of superannuation entities in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and the interests of fund members. The SISA was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament, aiming to provide comprehensive oversight and governance of the superannuation industry to prevent misconduct and mismanagement. The Act establishes a framework for the supervision of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards to safeguard the financial welfare of participants in the superannuation system. The enactment of the SISA seeks to address the gap in the regulation of superannuation trustees and their officers, thereby protecting the superannuation savings of Australians and maintaining public confidence in the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities. This includes individuals who are in a position of significant influence in relation to the administration or management of the superannuation entity. The Act's jurisdiction extends across Australia, as it is a Commonwealth Act, and applies to all superannuation entities operating within the country. The Act imposes disqualification provisions against individuals who have been responsible officers of corporate trustees that have contravened the provisions of the Act. The disqualification can be imposed if the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such action. The notice of disqualification is published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. The Act also provides for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification and a review process for those affected by the decision. The Act does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds for the application of the disqualification provisions. The Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, although the specific details are not outlined in the text.
Key Provisions
The notice provided is a formal communication under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), specifically referencing sections 126A(6) and 126A(2). It informs Mrs Joanne Lumsden that she has been disqualified from being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of a superannuation entity. This disqualification arises because there has been a contravention of the SISA by the corporate trustee, and Mrs Lumsden was a responsible officer at the time of these contraventions. The notice is effective from the date of issuance.
Under the SISA, Mrs Lumsden, as a disqualified person, is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that functions in these capacities. This disqualification is a direct consequence of the serious nature of the contraventions committed by the corporate trustee while she was in her role. The notice also mentions that this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, thereby making it a matter of public record.
The SISA imposes stringent obligations on individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry. Responsible officers, such as Mrs Lumsden, are expected to adhere to the regulatory standards set forth in the Act to ensure the proper management and supervision of superannuation entities. Failure to comply with these standards can lead to serious repercussions, including disqualification from holding any responsible position within the industry. The Act aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those managing these funds are fit and proper persons.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA, particularly by acting in a capacity that one is disqualified from, carries severe penalties. According to section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue to be or act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the law views such breaches. Additionally, the notice mentions that the disqualification can be revoked under subsection 126A(5) either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person.
If Mrs Lumsden is dissatisfied with the decision to disqualify her, she has the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should include the reasons why she believes the decision is incorrect. This provision allows for a level of procedural fairness and ensures that individuals have a mechanism to challenge decisions that may adversely affect them.