NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Jimmy Ray Kazal
SEAFORTH NSW 2092
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 14 December 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bernard Morrison
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and the interests of members. This legislation was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework that governs the operation of superannuation entities, trustees, and responsible officers. The overarching policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry by ensuring that entities and individuals managing superannuation funds meet certain standards of competence and probity. One of the mechanisms through which the SISA achieves this is by empowering the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds, as illustrated in the disqualification notice provided. This notice serves as a formal declaration under the SISA that an individual is not considered a fit and proper person to act as a trustee or a responsible officer of a superannuation entity, thereby protecting fund members from potential mismanagement or misconduct.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation entities. Specifically, it targets trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers who are integral to the operation of superannuation funds. The Act’s jurisdictional reach is national, as it operates under the Commonwealth’s legislative power, thereby affecting superannuation trustees and related officers across Australia. The disqualification provisions outlined in the Act ensure that only fit and proper persons can hold these critical roles, thereby safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act also delineates clear penalties for those who contravene the disqualification, reinforcing the importance of compliance with its stipulations. Exclusions or exemptions from these provisions are not explicitly stated in the notice, but the Act’s broad application suggests that it encompasses a wide range of entities and individuals within the superannuation industry unless otherwise specified through subordinate instruments.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions that enable the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from being trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. Section 126A(6) allows a delegate of the Commissioner to give notice of disqualification, as was done in the notice to Jimmy Ray Kazal, who has been found not to be a fit and proper person to hold such positions. This disqualification is immediate, taking effect on the date of the notice. Section 126K further delineates the actions that a disqualified person is prohibited from undertaking, which include acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or serving as a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The consequences for such actions are severe, with the offence carrying a potential penalty of up to two years in jail as stipulated in section 126K.
The Act imposes clear obligations on individuals who are disqualified, prohibiting them from participating in any capacity that involves managing or overseeing superannuation entities. This extends to any involvement with the financial management, decision-making processes, or governance of such entities. For Jimmy Ray Kazal, this means he cannot be a trustee, nor can he serve in any capacity that requires him to influence the financial decisions of a superannuation fund. The scope of this prohibition is broad, encompassing all roles that might allow him to exert control or influence over the management of superannuation assets.
In addition to the disqualification, the Act provides for the publication of the details of such disqualifications in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, as outlined in section 126A(7). This public notice ensures transparency and informs the public and relevant stakeholders of the disqualification. For Jimmy Ray Kazal, this means that his disqualification will be made public, thereby alerting any potential employers or other entities that he is not permitted to engage in activities related to superannuation management. The potential civil and criminal consequences for breaching the disqualification are significant, reinforcing the importance of adhering to the terms set out in the SISA. For instance, knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity could result in a jail term of up to two years, highlighting the serious nature of these offences.
The Act also provides avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of the disqualification. Under section 344, Jimmy Ray Kazal has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision if he believes it to be incorrect. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should detail the reasons for the dissatisfaction with the decision. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification may be revoked by the Commissioner either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This provision allows for the possibility of reinstatement if circumstances change and the individual can demonstrate that they are now fit and proper to hold such positions.