NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Jessica Hart
Stanwell Park NSW 2508
I, Susan Russell, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 16 December 2020
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the operations of the superannuation industry, ensuring it is conducted in a way that protects the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced to address the need for oversight and regulation of superannuation funds to safeguard the retirement savings of Australians. The SISA provides for the licensing of trustees, investment managers, and other entities involved in the management of superannuation funds, as well as setting standards for their conduct. The Parliament of Australia enacted the SISA with the policy objective of ensuring the integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness of the superannuation industry, thereby protecting the financial security of fund members. In cases where individuals or entities are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act, the SISA provides mechanisms for disqualification and other enforcement actions to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. This legislation operates on a national level, affecting all jurisdictions within Australia. The Act imposes disqualifications on individuals who have contravened its provisions, with the seriousness of the contravention being a key factor in determining whether disqualification is warranted. The notice of disqualification, as evidenced in the case of Jessica Hart, is issued by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation and takes immediate effect upon issuance. Note that this disqualification notice will also be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. It is important to highlight that being a disqualified person under the SISA, and knowingly acting in any capacity that the Act restricts, is an offence that carries a maximum penalty of two years in jail. The disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or through a written application by the disqualified individual. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner, provided the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides significant measures to oversee and regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring it operates in a manner that protects the interests of superannuation fund members. Section 126A(1) allows the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry if they have contravened the SISA. This disqualification can be imposed if the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such action. In this case, Jessica Hart has been disqualified under subsection 126A(6) by Susan Russell, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, as she has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions.
The disqualification imposes strict obligations on Jessica Hart. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds such roles. This prohibition is designed to prevent disqualified individuals from continuing to influence or manage superannuation entities, which could potentially harm members' interests. The penalties for contravening these provisions are severe; the maximum penalty is two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness of the offence.
Further, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA provides that the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This offers a potential pathway for Jessica Hart to seek reinstatement, although it requires a formal application and likely a demonstration that the grounds for the disqualification no longer apply.
In addition to the disqualification, section 344 of the SISA allows individuals affected by the decision to request a reconsideration from the Commissioner. This reconsideration must be requested in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and must detail the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a mechanism for appeal, providing an opportunity for the individual to contest the decision and potentially have it overturned or adjusted.