NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – JESSICA CHALLINOR
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
JESSICA CHALLINOR
HALLETT COVE SA 5158
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 29 June 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per JENNY MCGUIRE
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address issues and ensure the proper management and regulation of superannuation entities, protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act provides a framework for the supervision of superannuation funds, ensuring they are managed in a financially sound and responsible manner. It establishes the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) as the primary regulator of superannuation funds and sets out the powers and responsibilities of APRA and the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to the supervision of these entities. The policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by promoting the sound management of superannuation entities and enforcing compliance with the Act. This includes the power to disqualify individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, it targets trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act has a broad jurisdictional reach, applying across the Commonwealth, and is designed to ensure the proper governance and management of superannuation funds to protect the interests of members. However, the Act does not explicitly define exclusions or exemptions, indicating that its application is generally comprehensive unless otherwise specified through subordinate instruments. Notably, the Act allows for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions, as evidenced by the disqualification of Jessica Challinor under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA. This disqualification prohibits her from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with significant penalties for non-compliance. The disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance, and the details of such actions are to be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and accountability within the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides the legislative framework for the regulation and oversight of superannuation funds in Australia. Section 126A(1) of the Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles in superannuation entities if there are serious contraventions of the Act. In the case of Jessica Challinor, subsection 126A(6) mandates that she must be given notice of her disqualification by a delegate of the Commissioner, as was done in this instance by Emma Rosenzweig. The disqualification notice informs the individual that they have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions to a degree that warrants such action, and it specifies the immediate effect of the disqualification.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on entities and individuals within the superannuation industry are extensive. Trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers must ensure compliance with all provisions of the Act to avoid potential disqualification. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any of these roles, with a potential penalty of up to two years imprisonment. This serves as a strong deterrent against non-compliance and ensures that only those who adhere to the regulatory standards can participate in the administration of superannuation funds.
The Act also provides mechanisms for the revocation of disqualification. According to subsection 126A(5), the disqualification of an individual can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This provision allows for a review of the circumstances that led to the disqualification, providing an opportunity for rectification and reinstatement, provided the grounds for disqualification no longer exist. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA allows for an appeal against the disqualification decision, which must be lodged in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice. This ensures that the affected individual has a formal avenue to contest the decision if they believe it is unjust or incorrect.