NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Jennifer Marion Grech
Beveridge VIC 3753
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 5 February 2021
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Val Zollo
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address significant gaps in the regulation of the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the proper management and oversight of superannuation entities. The Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to provide a robust regulatory framework that could effectively monitor and enforce compliance within the superannuation sector. The primary policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation members by imposing stringent requirements on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, and by providing mechanisms for the disqualification of responsible officers who fail to meet these standards. This legislative approach seeks to mitigate risks associated with improper management and ensure that superannuation funds are administered in the best interests of their members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities within Australia. Specifically, the Act pertains to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities. This includes all types of superannuation funds, whether industry-specific, retail, or self-managed superannuation funds. The Act’s jurisdiction is national, applying across all states and territories of Australia as a Commonwealth legislation. However, the Act allows for certain exclusions and exemptions, particularly for small APRA-regulated funds and self-managed superannuation funds with assets below a certain threshold. The application of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which can provide further clarification on specific aspects of the legislation, such as the criteria for disqualifying responsible officers or the processes for appeal and reconsideration of decisions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a critical piece of legislation that governs the operation of the superannuation industry in Australia. Section 126A(2) provides the mechanism for disqualifying individuals who have been responsible officers of a corporate trustee when the trustee has contravened the Act. Section 126A(6) mandates that a notice of disqualification must be issued to the disqualified person, as evidenced in the notice given to Jennifer Marion Grech. This notice specifies that the disqualification is due to the contraventions by the corporate trustee while Jennifer was a responsible officer, and the seriousness of these contraventions justified the action. Section 126A(7) further stipulates that the details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette to ensure transparency.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on the parties it governs are stringent. Responsible officers of corporate trustees are expected to ensure compliance with the Act at all times. Any breach by the trustee while the responsible officer is in position results in personal accountability, which can lead to disqualification. Section 126K reinforces these obligations by imposing criminal penalties for disqualified individuals who continue to act in prohibited capacities, such as being a trustee or investment manager of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for such an offence is a two-year jail term, underscoring the seriousness of non-compliance.
In terms of consequences, the Act clearly outlines the potential civil and criminal repercussions for breaches. Section 126K specifically criminalises the act of a disqualified person continuing to be involved in the management of superannuation entities, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. Additionally, section 344 provides a process for reconsideration of the disqualification decision, allowing the affected individual to request the Commissioner to review the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This provision ensures that there is a mechanism for rectifying any perceived injustices in the disqualification process. The notice also mentions that the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person, as stipulated in subsection 126A(5).