NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Jeffrey Stevens
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Jeffrey Stevens
Glenelg East SA 5045
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 7 March 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Armides Morales
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a robust regulatory framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, addressing concerns over financial misconduct and the protection of superannuation funds. This Act was designed to ensure that the superannuation industry operates with integrity and transparency, safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, reflecting the federal oversight necessary to manage the widespread and significant impact of superannuation on the Australian economy and individual financial security. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the stability and reliability of the superannuation system, which is a critical component of Australia's retirement income framework.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act specifically targets trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers who are involved in the operation of superannuation entities. This legislation has a national reach, governing the conduct of these individuals and entities across the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions, but rather focuses on disqualifying individuals who have contravened its provisions. The disqualification process, as evidenced in the notice given to Jeffrey Stevens, is initiated by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation when it is determined that the individual has committed serious contraventions of the Act. The disqualification prohibits the individual from acting in any capacity that involves the management of superannuation funds, with severe penalties for non-compliance. The Act provides mechanisms for the reconsideration of disqualification decisions and potential revocation of the disqualification under certain conditions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a comprehensive piece of legislation designed to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia. Section 126A(6) mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must notify a disqualified individual, such as Jeffrey Stevens, of the decision to disqualify them. The notice, as provided in the gazette, indicates that Jeffrey Stevens has been disqualified under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA due to serious contraventions of the Act. This disqualification is effective immediately from the date of the notice. Additionally, subsection 126A(7) requires the publication of the disqualification notice in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
The SISA imposes specific obligations on individuals and entities within the superannuation industry. These obligations include compliance with various provisions of the Act, such as those relating to the management and administration of superannuation funds. Section 126K of the SISA stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or body corporate in such a role. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in serious legal consequences.
Breaching the SISA can lead to severe penalties and consequences. Section 126K explicitly states that knowingly acting in a restricted capacity while disqualified can result in a criminal offence, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. This highlights the seriousness with which the Act regards the management of superannuation funds. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) allows for the potential revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or based on a written application by the disqualified person. This provides a pathway for individuals to potentially regain their eligibility if they can demonstrate that the grounds for their disqualification no longer apply.
If Jeffrey Stevens, or any other affected party, is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. Any request for reconsideration must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the disqualification notice and must clearly outline the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect. This process ensures that there is a formal avenue for appeal, offering a degree of procedural fairness to those impacted by the disqualification decision.