NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Jayne Psaros
CONCORD WEST NSW 2138
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 27 June 2017
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per William Keating
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to ensure that trustees and responsible officers within the superannuation industry are fit and proper individuals, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA was passed by the Parliament of Australia and aims to maintain high standards of conduct and accountability within the industry, ultimately contributing to the financial security of Australians' retirement. The Act includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to hold certain positions within superannuation entities, as illustrated by the notice of disqualification issued to Jayne Psaros under the authority of the Act. This legislative framework is essential in upholding the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, it applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act is a Commonwealth statute, thereby having jurisdiction across the entire nation, ensuring uniform standards and regulations for superannuation fund management. The Act’s scope includes disqualifying individuals deemed unfit to hold positions of responsibility within superannuation entities, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Jayne Psaros. Any person disqualified under the Act faces severe consequences, including criminal penalties for continuing to act in a disqualified capacity. The Act also allows for the possibility of disqualification revocation and provides avenues for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner of Taxation.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Jayne Psaros that she has been disqualified from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee of a superannuation entity. This disqualification is made pursuant to subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, as the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, James O'Halloran, is satisfied that Ms Psaros is not a fit and proper person for such roles. This disqualification takes effect immediately from the date it is made.
The Act imposes several obligations on the disqualified person and the relevant authorities. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to continue acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This includes being a responsible officer of a body corporate that is involved in the management of superannuation entities. The primary obligation of the disqualified individual is to cease any activities related to the management or administration of superannuation entities.
Failing to comply with the disqualification can lead to serious consequences. According to section 126K, any disqualified person who knowingly acts in a prohibited capacity is liable to criminal penalties. The maximum penalty for this offence is a two-year imprisonment term. This serves as a deterrent to ensure that individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities do not continue in such roles.
Additionally, the disqualification notice stipulates that details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as per subsection 126A(7) of the SISA. This public notice ensures transparency and informs the public and relevant stakeholders of the disqualification. The notice also mentions the possibility of revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. This can occur either on the initiative of the authorities or following a written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, under section 344 of the SISA, if Ms Psaros is dissatisfied with the decision, she can request the Commissioner to reconsider it. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should include the reasons for her dissatisfaction with the decision.