NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Jayde Denkgelen
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Jayde Denkgelen
GREYSTANES NSW 2145
I, Emma Rozenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 29 March 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation within the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to ensure that the superannuation industry is managed responsibly and that trustees, investment managers and custodians adhere to the necessary standards and regulations. This was crucial in protecting the interests of superannuation fund members and maintaining the integrity of the industry. The Act was passed by the Parliament of Australia, reflecting a commitment to safeguarding the financial security of Australians by ensuring that their superannuation funds are managed with the utmost care and in accordance with the law.
In the context of this legislation, the problem or gap that the Act was designed to address includes instances where corporate trustees and other responsible officers within the superannuation industry have contravened the provisions of the Act, potentially putting the interests of superannuation fund members at risk. The policy objective of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 is to maintain high standards of governance and compliance within the industry, ensuring that superannuation funds are managed in the best interests of the members and that any breaches of the Act are met with appropriate penalties and sanctions. This includes the disqualification of individuals found to be in breach of the Act's provisions, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Jayde Denkgelen under subsection 126A(2) of the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and corporate entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act's jurisdictional reach is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, thereby extending its application across all states and territories in Australia. The Act's scope encompasses the conduct and transactions of those involved in the superannuation industry, particularly focusing on compliance with regulatory standards to ensure the proper management of superannuation funds. The Act includes provisions for disqualification of individuals who are found to have contravened its provisions, such as in the case of Jayde Denkgelen, who has been disqualified due to the corporate trustee's contraventions while Denkgelen was a responsible officer. The disqualification not only restricts the individual from acting in any capacity related to superannuation entities but also mandates the publication of such disqualifications in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. The Act further stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue acting in any capacity within the superannuation industry, with significant penalties, including imprisonment, for non-compliance. Additionally, there are provisions for the revocation of disqualification and the opportunity for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals who have been responsible officers of corporate trustees that have contravened the SISA. Under subsection 126A(2), a person can be disqualified if they were a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies such action. The disqualification, as notified to Jayde Denkgelen, takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice. This means that Jayde Denkgelen is immediately barred from acting as a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity or being a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity.
The SISA imposes obligations on the parties it governs, including responsible officers of corporate trustees. These obligations include ensuring compliance with the SISA and its regulations. If a responsible officer is aware that a contravention has occurred, they must take reasonable steps to remedy the contravention or report it to the Commissioner of Taxation. Additionally, the Act requires responsible officers to maintain accurate and complete records of the superannuation entity's activities, including financial transactions and investments.
Breaching the SISA by acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian while disqualified can result in criminal and civil penalties. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to be, or act as, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years in jail. Furthermore, the disqualification notice includes a notification that details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, which can have significant reputational consequences for the disqualified person.
The Act also provides for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5). This can occur either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Additionally, section 344 allows for a request to the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if the affected person is not satisfied with it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and must provide reasons for why the decision is considered wrong. This provision ensures that there is a mechanism for review and potential rectification of the disqualification decision if it is deemed unjust.