NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Jason Michael Bolt
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Jason Michael Bolt
MADDINGTON WA 6109
I, Emma Rozenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 17 March 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to provide comprehensive regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing the need for rigorous oversight to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to establish a framework for the effective governance and administration of superannuation entities, ensuring that funds are managed in the best interests of members. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain and enhance the integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness of the superannuation system, thereby safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation members. Under this Act, the Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to disqualify individuals who have acted contrary to the provisions of the Act, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Jason Michael Bolt for his role as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. The Act has a national reach, applying across Australia and ensuring the proper management and regulation of superannuation entities to protect the interests of members. The Act’s scope includes the conduct and transactions related to superannuation funds, as well as the governance and management of superannuation entities. Exclusions and exemptions are generally limited, though specific provisions may apply to certain types of funds or entities. The application of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or guidelines issued by the Commissioner of Taxation, which provide further detail on compliance and enforcement mechanisms. The disqualification provisions, for instance, are designed to prevent individuals who have demonstrated a pattern of non-compliance from participating in the management of superannuation entities, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the superannuation system.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued to Jason Michael Bolt under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) indicates that the Commissioner of Taxation has disqualified him from being involved in the management of superannuation entities. This disqualification arises because the Commissioner is satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has breached the SISA, and at the time of these breaches, Jason was a responsible officer of the corporate trustee. The seriousness of these breaches justifies the disqualification. The disqualification takes immediate effect as stated in the notice.
Under this Act, the obligations imposed on individuals like Jason, who have been disqualified, include refraining from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of any superannuation entity. Additionally, if they are associated with a body corporate that serves in these roles, they must also ensure that the entity complies with the SISA. The notice clearly outlines these restrictions, emphasising the need for compliance to avoid further legal repercussions.
Breaching the terms of this disqualification is an offence under section 126K of the SISA. Specifically, it is illegal for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to act in any capacity as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be associated with a body corporate that does so. The potential criminal penalty for such an offence is a maximum of two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance.
Moreover, the notice includes provisions for potential revocation of the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the Commissioner may revoke the disqualification either on their own initiative or in response to a written application by the disqualified individual. Additionally, for those who feel the disqualification decision is unjust, the Act provides a recourse under section 344, allowing for a request to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This must be made in writing and should detail the reasons for dissatisfaction with the original decision.