NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - JASON IAN BICE
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
JASON IAN BICE
BURWOOD EAST VIC 3151
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A (6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A (2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 10 March 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Mark Webberley
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A (7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A (5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate and supervise the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing the need for a comprehensive framework to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation was introduced to address the problem of ensuring the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds, safeguarding the retirement savings of millions of Australians. The Act was enacted by the Parliament of Australia, reflecting a policy objective to maintain high standards of governance and compliance within the superannuation sector, thereby fostering trust and confidence in the system. Under this Act, measures are in place to disqualify individuals who have demonstrated a pattern of non-compliance or misconduct, thereby preventing them from holding responsible positions within superannuation entities. This ensures that those managing superannuation funds adhere to stringent standards of conduct and accountability.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities, ensuring the proper management and oversight of superannuation funds. This Act extends to all trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities within the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring a national standard of governance and compliance in the industry. Exclusions or exemptions under the Act are not explicitly mentioned in the provided notice, but the application of the Act may be subject to subordinate instruments that detail specific regulations and compliance requirements. The disqualification of individuals such as Jason Ian Bice, as per the notice, is a clear demonstration of the Act’s enforcement mechanism against those who fail to comply with its provisions, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a critical piece of legislation that governs the conduct and management of superannuation entities in Australia. One of the key provisions of this Act, specifically under section 126A, relates to the disqualification of individuals who are responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities. In this case, Jason Ian Bice has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) because he was a responsible officer when the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities contravened the SISA. The seriousness of these contraventions provided sufficient grounds for the disqualification.
The disqualification, which was carried out by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, means that Jason Ian Bice is now barred from acting or being involved in certain capacities related to superannuation entities. Specifically, under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, the details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public awareness. Furthermore, section 126K of the SISA outlines the offences associated with being a disqualified person. It is an offence for such a person, who is aware of their disqualification, to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate involved in these roles.
The penalties for breaching these provisions are severe. Under section 126K, the maximum penalty for committing the offence of acting while disqualified is two years imprisonment. This reflects the seriousness with which the legislation treats the integrity and proper management of superannuation entities. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) provides for the possibility of revoking the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This offers a potential path for Jason Ian Bice to have his disqualification reconsidered and possibly revoked under certain conditions.
For those affected by the disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides recourse. If Jason Ian Bice is not satisfied with the disqualification decision, he can request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and should include the reasons why the decision is thought to be incorrect. This ensures that there is a formal process for challenging disqualifications, providing a safeguard against potential injustices.