NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Jason Gillingham 23 November 2023
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Jason Gillingham
BALDIVIS WA 6171
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 November 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the proper management and supervision of superannuation entities, addressing the need for regulatory oversight to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament with the policy objective of maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. In the case of Jason Gillingham, the Act was invoked due to a contravention by the corporate trustee of a superannuation entity, for which he was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions, leading to his disqualification under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA. This legislative action aims to deter and penalise misconduct within the superannuation industry, with severe penalties including up to two years in jail for a disqualified person acting in prohibited capacities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. The Act specifically targets the conduct of these individuals and entities to ensure compliance with the regulatory framework governing superannuation entities. Its jurisdiction extends across Australia, as it is a Commonwealth Act. The SISA provides for disqualification of responsible officers found to have contravened its provisions, and in this case, Jason Gillingham has been disqualified due to multiple contraventions by the corporate trustee of which he was a responsible officer. The disqualification restricts his ability to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, and contravening this restriction is an offence carrying a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The Act allows for the disqualification to be revoked under certain conditions and provides a process for reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of notification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions that empower the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify certain individuals from being involved in the administration of superannuation entities. Section 126A(2) of the Act provides the grounds for disqualification, which includes instances where a corporate trustee contravenes the Act, and the individual in question, who was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions, is deemed to have acted in such a way that warrants disqualification. Section 126A(6) mandates that the Commissioner must notify the disqualified individual, as seen in the notice issued to Jason Gillingham, detailing the reasons for the disqualification and the effective date of the disqualification.
The obligations imposed on the parties governed by the SISA are significant and multifaceted. For instance, trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities are required to adhere strictly to the provisions of the Act, ensuring compliance in all dealings. The responsible officers of corporate trustees are expected to oversee the activities of the entities to prevent any contraventions of the Act. The notice to Jason Gillingham highlights that any contraventions by the corporate trustee, coupled with his role as a responsible officer, led to his disqualification.
The Act also delineates severe consequences for breaches of its provisions. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that fulfils these roles. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is a two-year jail term, illustrating the gravity of non-compliance. This section aims to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry by preventing disqualified individuals from exerting influence over superannuation entities.
Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for the revocation of disqualifications under subsection 126A(5), which can occur either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This provision offers a pathway for individuals to seek relief from their disqualification if circumstances have changed or if they can demonstrate that the grounds for disqualification no longer apply. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA allows individuals who are affected by the disqualification decision to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision, provided the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and includes the reasons for the dissatisfaction.