NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Jason Bryant - 1 July 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Jason Bryant
SEMAPHORE SA 5019
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 July 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Narinder Singh
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate and oversee the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing issues such as the proper management and administration of superannuation entities. This Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament to ensure the protection of superannuation funds and the rights of superannuation members. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation system by imposing responsibilities on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, and by providing mechanisms for enforcement and penalties for non-compliance. The SISA aims to prevent misconduct and mismanagement within the superannuation industry, thereby safeguarding the interests of superannuation members and promoting confidence in the system. The Act includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its requirements, ensuring that those who act irresponsibly are held accountable.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation entities, including corporate trustees and responsible officers. In this case, the Act was invoked to disqualify Jason Bryant, a responsible officer of a corporate trustee, due to breaches of the Act by the corporate trustee. The disqualification, which is effective immediately upon issuance, is both a punitive measure and a safeguard to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry. Geographically, the Act has a national reach, applying across all states and territories within Australia. However, the Act also allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, enabling the regulation to be tailored to specific circumstances or sectors within the superannuation industry. Furthermore, the Act explicitly states that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with a potential penalty of up to two years imprisonment. This legislative framework underscores the seriousness with which the Commonwealth views compliance within the superannuation sector.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes a provision (subsection 126A(2)) under which the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify an individual from acting in certain capacities related to superannuation entities. In this case, Jason Bryant has been disqualified under this subsection as he was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the SISA on multiple occasions. The disqualification, as per subsection 126A(6), is communicated through a formal notice and becomes effective on the date of issuance. The notice includes the name of the person issuing the disqualification, which in this instance is Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation.
The Act imposes specific obligations on the disqualified individual, prohibiting them from acting or being involved as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. It also bars them from being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. These prohibitions are intended to ensure that individuals who have been found to have contravened the SISA do not continue to hold positions of responsibility that would allow them to affect the administration of superannuation entities.
Breach of these obligations constitutes an offence under section 126K of the SISA. A disqualified person who knowingly acts in a prohibited capacity can be subject to criminal penalties, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. This serves as a strong deterrent to ensure compliance with the disqualification order. Additionally, the disqualification may be revoked under subsection 126A(5) either by the Commissioner's initiative or following a written application by the disqualified person.
Should Jason Bryant or any other affected party disagree with the disqualification, they have the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should outline the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. Such reconsideration is governed by section 344 of the SISA, providing a formal process for disputing the disqualification. Furthermore, details of the disqualification will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness of the disqualification.