NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – JAMIE FANNING - 12 April 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
JAMIE FANNING
CARRARA QLD 4211
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 April 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to provide a robust framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. This Act addresses the problem of inadequate oversight and management within the superannuation industry, which could potentially lead to financial mismanagement and breaches of fiduciary duties. The legislation was enacted by the Australian Parliament, with the policy objective of enhancing the accountability and transparency of superannuation trustees and other key personnel within the industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles within superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act in a manner that warrants such a measure. This legislative instrument is designed to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system and safeguard the financial security of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, particularly those who act as trustees, investment managers, custodians, or responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act has a national reach, applying across Australia, and its provisions extend to both the Commonwealth and the states and territories. The SISA includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who contravene its requirements, with serious contraventions providing grounds for such disqualification. The Act also criminalises the act of a disqualified person continuing to act in any capacity within a superannuation entity, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. Notably, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualification on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person, and it provides a pathway for reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of the notice being received. The Act’s scope is further extended through subordinate instruments which may provide additional details or conditions regarding the application of the legislation.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to this notice include subsection 126A(6) (subsection 126A(6)), which allows for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened the Act. The notice issued to Jamie Fanning, dated 12 April 2024, informs him of his disqualification under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA (subsection 126A(1)). This disqualification is effective immediately upon the issuance of the notice. Additionally, subsection 126A(7) (subsection 126A(7)) mandates that the details of this disqualification be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Under the SISA, the obligations imposed on parties such as Jamie Fanning include compliance with the Act's provisions. The notice explicitly states that Jamie has contravened the Act, and the seriousness of these contraventions justifies his disqualification. Consequently, he is prohibited from acting in any capacity that involves the management or oversight of superannuation entities, such as being a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or serving as a responsible officer or body corporate in such roles (section 126K). Failure to adhere to these restrictions can result in severe legal consequences.
The SISA imposes significant penalties for breaches of the disqualification provisions. Specifically, section 126K (section 126K) outlines that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in the prohibited roles while being aware of their disqualification. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment. Furthermore, the Act provides avenues for the revocation of disqualification, either by the authority’s own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified individual (subsection 126A(5)). For those who wish to contest the decision, section 344 (section 344) of the SISA allows for a request to the Commissioner to reconsider the disqualification within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided that the request is made in writing and includes the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision.