NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – James Thompson
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
James Thompson
COCONUT GROVE NT 0810
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 4 July 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Christiane Boissezon
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues within the superannuation industry, ensuring proper oversight and regulation to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework that includes the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation system by preventing and addressing misconduct within the industry. In accordance with the Act, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to disqualify individuals who have been identified as responsible officers of corporate trustees that have contravened the provisions of the SISA. This legislative measure aims to deter and address serious contraventions that could potentially harm the superannuation system and its beneficiaries.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to the management and supervision of superannuation entities in Australia, with a particular focus on ensuring the proper conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act applies to individuals and corporate entities that are involved in the administration of superannuation funds, including their officers, trustees, and investment managers. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act. The Act provides for the disqualification of responsible officers of corporate trustees who have contravened its provisions, with the disqualification becoming effective immediately upon notice. The legislation also sets out penalties for disqualified individuals who continue to act in their former capacities, including the possibility of imprisonment for up to two years. Additionally, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualifications and provides a mechanism for those affected by a disqualification decision to request a reconsideration of that decision within 21 days of receiving notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines specific provisions for the disqualification of individuals involved with superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(6) of the Act, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, such as Emma Rosenzweig in the given notice, can disqualify a person if they have reasonable grounds to believe the individual was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the SISA. In this case, James Thompson has been disqualified because he was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions, and the seriousness of the contraventions warranted the disqualification. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice, as stated in the notice dated 4 July 2023.
The Act imposes several obligations on individuals like James Thompson. First, if a responsible officer is aware that the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA, they must ensure that corrective actions are taken to comply with the law. Failure to do so can lead to personal disqualification. Additionally, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or to be a responsible officer of such a body. This means that James Thompson is prohibited from engaging in any capacity that involves managing or overseeing superannuation funds until his disqualification is resolved.
Violating the provisions of the SISA can result in serious consequences. According to section 126K, if a disqualified person knowingly acts in a prohibited capacity, they commit an offence that carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This underscores the importance of adhering to the disqualification order and avoiding any activities that might be construed as managing superannuation entities. Additionally, the disqualification notice informs that details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, which serves as public notice of the individual's disqualification.
For James Thompson, there are avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by James Thompson himself. This provides a mechanism for rectifying any misunderstandings or new evidence that might alter the circumstances leading to the disqualification. Furthermore, if James Thompson is dissatisfied with the decision, he has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as outlined in section 344 of the SISA. This request must be in writing and include the reasons he believes the decision is incorrect.