| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Jacquelyn S Richardson
Cheltenham VIC 3192
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 5 November 2018
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Lazzaroni
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a robust framework for the supervision of superannuation entities, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring their retirement savings are managed prudently and ethically. This Act was introduced to address the need for stricter regulation in the superannuation industry, given its significant impact on the financial security of Australians. The SISA is administered by the Australian Parliament, with the overarching policy objective of safeguarding the superannuation system from malpractice and ensuring compliance with stringent standards. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened its provisions, as demonstrated in the notice of disqualification to Jacquelyn S Richardson, reflecting the serious consequences for breaches that threaten the integrity of the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act has a national jurisdictional reach as it is a Commonwealth legislation. The scope of the Act is to ensure that the superannuation industry is properly regulated and that individuals involved in it comply with relevant laws and regulations. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions, as evidenced in the notice to Jacquelyn S Richardson, who has been disqualified due to breaches of the Act. The disqualification can be revoked under certain conditions, and there is a provision for reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving notice. The Act also imposes criminal penalties for disqualified persons who continue to act in their prohibited roles. The application of the Act can be extended or modified through subordinate instruments as necessary.
Key Provisions
The notice provided under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Jacquelyn S Richardson of her disqualification from certain roles within the superannuation industry. Specifically, subsection 126A(1) of the SISA empowers the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals found to have contravened the Act, and in this case, the delegate has determined that Jacquelyn's actions warrant such a disqualification (subsection 126A(6)). This decision is effective immediately upon issuance of the notice.
Under the SISA, the disqualification imposes strict limitations on Jacquelyn's ability to participate in the superannuation industry. As outlined in section 126K of the Act, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or be part of a body corporate that holds such roles within a superannuation entity. These prohibitions are designed to ensure that individuals who have demonstrated misconduct or incompetence are prevented from influencing or managing superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members.
The legal consequences of breaching these provisions are severe. Section 126K stipulates that knowingly engaging in any of the prohibited activities while disqualified can result in criminal charges. The maximum penalty for such an offence is imprisonment for up to two years, underscoring the seriousness with which the legislation treats violations of these restrictions. This punitive measure serves as a deterrent against non-compliance and reinforces the legislative intent to maintain high standards within the superannuation industry.
Moreover, the notice includes procedural details for potential recourse. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either by the delegate on their own initiative or upon a written application from Jacquelyn. Additionally, section 344 of the Act provides a mechanism for Jacquelyn to request a reconsideration of the decision if she believes it to be unjust. This reconsideration must be requested in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must include the reasons for the dissatisfaction with the original decision. These provisions ensure that there are avenues for review and potential rectification, maintaining a balance between punitive measures and procedural fairness.