| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Irene Haas
UPPER COOMERA QLD 4209
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsections 126A(1) and 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 5 November 2018
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Lazzaroni
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for regulation and supervision of superannuation entities in order to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act aims to ensure that trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities are fit and proper persons who adhere to the standards prescribed by the legislation. The notice of disqualification published in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette pertains to the enforcement of these standards, specifically targeting individuals who have contravened the provisions of the SISA. The policy objective of the SISA, as reflected in this disqualification notice, is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry by disqualifying unfit and improper persons from managing superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a significant piece of Australian legislation that applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities. Specifically, the Act applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of bodies corporate that manage superannuation funds. The legislation covers conduct and transactions related to superannuation funds, and its reach extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring a consistent regulatory environment. The Act provides certain exclusions and exemptions, but these are narrowly defined to maintain the integrity of superannuation fund management. Additionally, the scope of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, allowing for more detailed regulations and standards to be set by the relevant authorities. The Act’s provisions are designed to ensure that only fit and proper persons are involved in the administration of superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides a framework for the regulation of superannuation entities, including the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds. Section 126A(1) and (3) of the SISA empowers a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from being trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities if it is determined that they have contravened the SISA and are not fit and proper persons to hold such positions. In this instance, Irene Haas has been disqualified under these sections based on the delegate's satisfaction that she has contravened the SISA and is unfit for her role.
The disqualification notice, dated 5 November 2018, issued by James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, informs Irene Haas that she is disqualified from acting as a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This disqualification is effective immediately from the date of the notice. The notice also states that the details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as per subsection 126A(7) of the SISA.
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The penalty for this offence is a maximum of two years imprisonment. This provision underscores the importance of compliance with the SISA and the severe consequences of non-compliance, particularly for those who continue to manage superannuation funds despite being disqualified.
Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA provides for the potential revocation of a disqualification notice either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. Section 344 of the SISA also allows for a reconsideration request to be made in writing to the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the disqualification notice, should the individual believe the decision to be incorrect. This ensures that there is a process in place for reviewing and potentially reversing the disqualification if new information or circumstances warrant such action.