NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – INDRA TENGARA
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
INDRA TENGARA
LEUMEAH NSW 2560
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 September 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nicola Wood-Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent regulation within the superannuation industry in Australia, particularly concerning the conduct and management of superannuation entities. This legislation aims to safeguard the financial interests and retirement savings of Australians by ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians operate with integrity and compliance. The SISA provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals from acting in responsible roles within superannuation entities if they have been involved in significant breaches of the Act. The enactment of this Act by the Australian Parliament underscores the policy objective of maintaining high standards of governance and accountability within the superannuation sector to protect beneficiaries' interests. The disqualification of Indra Tengara, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, exemplifies the application of this legislative framework to enforce compliance and deter misconduct within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees in the superannuation industry, ensuring compliance with superannuation laws and regulations. The Act specifically targets individuals like Indra Tengara who, as a responsible officer, failed to prevent contraventions by the corporate trustee, leading to their disqualification. This disqualification extends nationally under the Commonwealth jurisdiction, affecting Indra Tengara's capacity to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of any superannuation entity. The Act also criminalises any attempt by a disqualified person to engage in such roles, with penalties including up to two years in jail. Disqualifications can be initiated by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation and can be subject to revocation under certain conditions, offering a pathway for the affected individual to apply for reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving notice.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) that apply in this case are subsections 126A(2) and 126A(6). Under subsection 126A(2), the Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to disqualify an individual from being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of a superannuation entity if they are satisfied that the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions. The disqualification notice, which is given under subsection 126A(6), informs the individual that they have been disqualified from holding such a position due to the corporate trustee's contraventions. The disqualification becomes effective on the day the notice is made.
The Act imposes specific obligations on the parties it governs, particularly on responsible officers of corporate trustees. These individuals must ensure that their corporate trustee complies with the SISA, which includes adhering to various financial, governance, and reporting requirements. If a corporate trustee contravenes the SISA, and the responsible officer was aware of the contraventions at the time they occurred, the Act allows for the disqualification of that officer. This is intended to ensure that individuals in positions of responsibility within superannuation entities uphold the standards set by the Act.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA that lead to disqualification carries significant consequences. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years in jail, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or following a written application by the disqualified individual.
For individuals affected by the disqualification decision and who are not satisfied with it, the Act provides a mechanism for reconsideration. Under section 344 of the SISA, the Commissioner can reconsider the decision if the affected person requests it in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision. This request must include the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a process for disputing the disqualification, offering a degree of procedural fairness to those impacted by the Commissioner's decision.