Notice of Disqualification - Ilio Bucinski

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au C2016G01588 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

 

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

To: Ilio Bucinski

BANKSTOWN NSW 2200

 

I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, investment manager or custodian, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 5 December 2016

 

James O’Halloran

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

 


Note 1:

In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.

Note 2:

In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.

Note 3:

In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced to ensure that the administration of superannuation funds is conducted in a manner that protects the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA was enacted by the Parliament of Australia with the policy objective of enhancing the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation industry. The Act provides the framework for the regulation of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, and it includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to manage these entities. This regulatory approach is intended to maintain the trust and confidence of the public in the superannuation system, ensuring that funds are managed responsibly and in the best interests of the beneficiaries.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities in Australia, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate bodies that perform these roles. The Act operates on a national level, extending its reach across all states and territories in Australia, thus ensuring a uniform regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation entities. The Act specifies criteria for disqualifying individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds, as exemplified by the disqualification notice issued to Ilio Bucinski. This disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance and includes provisions for potential revocation and the right to request reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. The Act's scope is further defined through subordinate instruments which may impose additional conditions or clarify specific applications of the legislation.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are sections 126A(3) and 126A(6). Section 126A(3) allows the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify an individual if they are not deemed fit and proper to be a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or a responsible officer of a superannuation entity. Section 126A(6) mandates that the Commissioner must provide written notice of this disqualification to the affected individual. In this case, the Commissioner has exercised this power against Ilio Bucinski, declaring him disqualified with immediate effect due to concerns about his suitability in his roles related to superannuation entities. The Act imposes specific obligations on entities and individuals within the superannuation industry. Trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of body corporates must maintain a high standard of integrity and competence to manage superannuation funds. The Act requires that these individuals act in the best interests of the members of the superannuation fund and adhere to rigorous standards of financial management and accountability. By disqualifying Ilio Bucinski, the Act ensures that only fit and proper persons are entrusted with these critical responsibilities, thereby safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. Under the SISA, breaches of the disqualification provisions can lead to severe consequences. While the Act does not specify a particular offence related to the disqualification itself, it is part of a broader framework designed to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system. Entities or individuals found to be operating in contravention of the disqualification provisions may face civil or criminal penalties. Although the notice does not specify a particular penalty for this disqualification, general penalties under the SISA can include substantial fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the breach. The exact penalties would be determined based on the specific circumstances and the discretion of the court. In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, the details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public accountability. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) of the Act allows for the revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This provision offers a measure of recourse for those who believe their disqualification was unjust. Finally, section 344 of the SISA provides an avenue for reconsideration by the Commissioner if the disqualified individual is dissatisfied with the decision. Such a request for reconsideration must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice, outlining the reasons for the request.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Corporate Law & Governance
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.