NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ilamiana Okusitino
DERRIMUT VIC 3026
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 30 July 2019
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Mark Webberley
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry, particularly in response to instances of misconduct and breaches of trust by industry participants. This legislative framework aims to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, safeguarding the retirement savings of millions of Australians. As per the Act, individuals who have seriously contravened its provisions may be disqualified from participating in the superannuation industry, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Ilamiana Okusitino under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, it applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, responsible officers, and body corporates that manage superannuation entities, which are defined as entities that provide superannuation benefits. The Act’s jurisdiction is at the Commonwealth level, extending across all states and territories of Australia. However, the Act also provides for its provisions to be applied through subordinate instruments, potentially extending its application or setting thresholds and exemptions. The disqualification notice issued under this Act to Ilamiana Okusitino is a direct application of its provisions, signifying that the individual has contravened the Act and has been disqualified from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry. The notice also highlights the serious consequences of such disqualifications, including potential criminal penalties for continuing to act in a disqualified capacity.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides a framework for the regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. Section 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of individuals who contravene the SISA, particularly if the seriousness of the contravention justifies such action. Section 126A(6) requires a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to provide a notice of disqualification, which is the legal instrument used to inform the disqualified individual of their status. This notice, as evidenced in the document, was issued to Ilamiana Okusitino, informing her of her disqualification and the reasons for it, which are grounded in subsection 126A(6).
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties it governs include strict compliance with the Act's provisions, which aim to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. For individuals, such as Ilamiana Okusitino, this includes adherence to the ethical and professional standards expected in managing superannuation funds. Trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities must also comply with the Act, ensuring that they manage funds in a manner that is transparent, accountable, and in the best interest of the members. Failure to meet these obligations can result in disqualification, as was the case with Ilamiana Okusitino.
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This is a significant restriction as these roles are central to the management and oversight of superannuation funds. The seriousness of this offence is underscored by the potential penalty of two years imprisonment, as provided for in the same section. This penalty serves as a deterrent against non-compliance and reinforces the importance of adhering to the Act's requirements. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the revocation of a disqualification, either by the Commissioner's initiative or upon the written application of the disqualified person, offering a potential path to reinstatement under certain conditions.
Finally, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for review and reconsideration of the disqualification decision. If Ilamiana Okusitino, or any other affected party, is dissatisfied with the decision, they have the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and must detail the reasons for dissatisfaction. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging decisions that may have significant personal and professional consequences, providing a level of procedural fairness and the opportunity for rectification if there are grounds for reconsideration.