NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Henry Cheung
CANLEY HEIGHTS NSW 2166
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 18 May 2018
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Lazzaroni
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds within Australia. This legislation was introduced to address the need for robust oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA establishes a framework for the supervision and regulation of superannuation entities, including trustees and responsible officers, and provides mechanisms for disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to manage these entities. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain high standards of conduct and competence among those responsible for managing superannuation funds, thereby safeguarding the financial security of superannuation members. The Act is administered by the Parliament of Australia, reflecting the Commonwealth's commitment to ensuring the superannuation system's integrity and reliability.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation entities, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers are fit and proper persons. This legislation has a national reach across Australia, overseen by the Commonwealth, and encompasses all trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act includes provisions for disqualification of individuals deemed unfit, with the disqualification taking immediate effect upon issuance. Additionally, the Act imposes criminal penalties for disqualified individuals who continue to act in their former capacities, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The Act allows for the revocation of disqualification notices either at the initiative of the delegate or upon written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, the Act provides for appeals against disqualification decisions, which must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice. The disqualification details are mandated to be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public accountability.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions for disqualifying individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities. Section 126A(3) allows for the disqualification of an individual from acting as a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee of a superannuation entity if the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation is satisfied that the individual is not a fit and proper person. Section 126A(6) requires that notice of this disqualification be given to the individual, as demonstrated in the notice to Mr. Henry Cheung.
Under the SISA, a disqualified person is prohibited from acting or being a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles, as per section 126K. This prohibition is intended to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members and beneficiaries by ensuring that only suitable individuals manage their superannuation funds. The penalties for contravening these provisions can be severe, with section 126K stating that the maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment.
The notice of disqualification, as provided to Mr. Cheung, informs him that he has been disqualified from managing superannuation entities due to a determination that he is not a fit and proper person for such roles. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice, as stated in the notice itself. Additionally, under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, the details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public accountability.
There are provisions for potential relief from disqualification. Subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the revocation of a disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner’s delegate or upon the written application of the disqualified person. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides a recourse for individuals who disagree with the disqualification decision. They may request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided they submit their reasons in writing for why the decision should be reconsidered.