NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Henri George Durden Kerehoma
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To: Henri George Durden Kerehoma
MARAYONG NSW 2148
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and at the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 19 September 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Karen A Taylor
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to establish a regulatory framework for the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the proper management and administration of superannuation funds. This legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation within the superannuation sector, which had grown significantly in importance and complexity within the Australian financial system. The Act's primary policy objective is to safeguard the retirement savings of Australians by enforcing compliance and penalising misconduct among trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation funds. The notice of disqualification issued under the SISA reflects the Act's commitment to maintaining high standards of conduct within the industry and penalising those who fail to meet these standards.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities that are involved in the management or oversight of superannuation funds within Australia, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. This Act covers the entire Commonwealth jurisdiction, ensuring that the standards and regulations set forth are uniformly enforced across all states and territories. The disqualification notice given to Henri George Durden Kerehoma highlights the Act’s application to individuals who have breached the provisions of the SISA, leading to their disqualification from participating in the management of superannuation entities. The notice specifies that the disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance, and any attempt by the disqualified person to act in their former capacity is considered an offence, punishable by up to two years in jail. Additionally, the Act allows for the possibility of disqualification revocation either through the department's initiative or via a written application from the disqualified person. Furthermore, if the individual is aggrieved by the decision, they have the right to request a reconsideration from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are subsections 126A(1) and 126A(6). Under subsection 126A(1), the Commissioner of Taxation is empowered to disqualify individuals from participating in the superannuation industry if they find the person has contravened the Act on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualification. Subsection 126A(6) mandates that the Commissioner must give notice to the disqualified person, which is what is happening in this case with Henri George Durden Kerehoma. The notice, dated 19 September 2022, is signed by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner, and it formally communicates the disqualification to Henri George Durden Kerehoma.
The SISA imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties or entities it governs. For individuals like Henri George Durden Kerehoma, the Act demands adherence to its provisions to maintain eligibility to participate in the superannuation industry. This includes avoiding any actions or behaviours that could be considered as contraventions of the Act. The Act also requires the Commissioner to ensure that individuals who have been disqualified are informed of their status in a formal and documented manner, which is achieved through the disqualification notice.
The SISA sets out clear consequences for non-compliance. Section 126K outlines that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The penalty for committing this offence is a maximum of two years imprisonment, as specified in the notice. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or based on a written application from the disqualified person. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides for a reconsideration process, allowing the Commissioner to review the decision if Henri George Durden Kerehoma submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, explaining why the decision should be reconsidered.