NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Harleen Kaur – 15 September 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
HARLEEN KAUR
GLENELG SA 5045
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 15 September 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Karen A Taylor
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the integrity and competence of those managing these funds. The Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to fill a critical gap in the oversight of the rapidly growing superannuation sector, which was becoming increasingly complex and important in the Australian financial system. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain high standards of conduct and competence among trustees, investment managers, custodians, and other responsible officers in the superannuation industry, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities if they have contravened the provisions of the Act, ensuring that only those who meet the required standards can operate within this sector.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The Act has a Commonwealth reach and is designed to regulate and supervise the conduct of those within the superannuation industry to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act's application is extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, allowing for specific provisions and regulations that further define the scope and enforcement mechanisms. Exclusions or exemptions from the Act's provisions are generally not provided unless explicitly stated in the legislation or subordinate instruments. The Act's enforcement includes the ability to disqualify individuals who contravene its provisions, as demonstrated in the notice given to Harleen Kaur. This disqualification not only restricts the individual's ability to participate in the superannuation industry but also includes criminal penalties for knowingly acting in a capacity restricted by the disqualification. Furthermore, the Commissioner has the authority to reconsider or revoke the disqualification under specific conditions, providing a pathway for resolution and potential reinstatement.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides specific mechanisms for disqualifying individuals who have contravened its provisions. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can issue a notice of disqualification to an individual such as Harleen Kaur, who has been found to have contravened the Act. The disqualification becomes effective on the day it is issued, as highlighted in the notice provided to Harleen Kaur on 15 September 2025. The disqualification notice informs the individual that they have been disqualified from certain roles related to superannuation entities due to repeated contraventions of the SISA.
The Act imposes clear obligations on individuals such as Harleen Kaur. Under section 126K, it is a criminal offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This is a strict liability offence, meaning that the knowledge of being disqualified is not a necessary element for conviction, but rather the act of continuing in such a role. The obligation to refrain from such activities is paramount to avoid criminal liability.
Breaching these obligations carries significant consequences. Section 126K imposes a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment for knowingly being, or acting as, a disqualified person in roles related to superannuation entities. This underscores the seriousness with which the SISA treats non-compliance and the potential criminal repercussions for individuals who continue to engage in prohibited activities. Additionally, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person, as per subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. If Harleen Kaur wishes to challenge the disqualification, she must request a reconsideration in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice, as stipulated in section 344 of the SISA. This request must detail the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect.