NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Gustavo Maia De Cerqueira - 5 September 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Gustavo Maia De Cerqueira
PENNANT HILLS NSW 2120
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2).
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 5 September 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Valentino Zollo
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide comprehensive regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that superannuation entities are managed efficiently, transparently, and in the best interests of members. This legislation was introduced to address gaps in the regulation of superannuation trustees and their responsibilities, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. Enacted by the Australian Parliament, the policy objective of the SISA is to maintain high standards of conduct and accountability within the superannuation industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have acted in a manner that warrants such action, ensuring that those who fail to uphold the standards set by the Act are appropriately sanctioned. This legislative framework is essential for maintaining the integrity and reliability of superannuation funds, thereby providing security and peace of mind for Australian retirees and those saving for their future.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, it governs trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. This Act is a Commonwealth statute, thus it has nationwide application across Australia, imposing obligations and restrictions on those who manage superannuation funds irrespective of state or territory boundaries. The Act primarily targets the conduct and transactions of entities involved in superannuation, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards to protect superannuation fund members. The scope of the Act can be extended through subordinate legislation and regulations, which provide further detail and specific requirements that complement the primary Act. There are, however, certain exclusions and exemptions within the SISA that may apply to particular entities or types of superannuation arrangements. In this instance, the Act has been invoked to disqualify Gustavo Maia De Cerqueira from acting as a responsible officer of a superannuation entity due to the contravention of the Act by the corporate trustee for which he was responsible.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains key provisions that are critical for the oversight of superannuation entities. Section 126A(6) allows a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to issue a notice of disqualification to an individual, such as Gustavo Maia De Cerqueira in this case, when they believe the individual has grounds for disqualification due to serious contraventions of the Act. The notice informs the individual that they have been disqualified from acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This disqualification is based on subsection 126A(2), which permits the disqualification if the individual was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions and the seriousness of those contraventions justifies such action.
The obligations imposed by the Act on parties like Gustavo Maia De Cerqueira include refraining from acting in any capacity related to the management or administration of superannuation entities. This means that they cannot serve as trustees, investment managers, custodians, or responsible officers of any superannuation entity. The Act further mandates that any disqualified person must be aware of their disqualification status, and knowingly acting in any of the prohibited roles constitutes an offence. The Act provides clear guidelines to ensure that those who have been found to have contravened the legislation do not continue to participate in the management of superannuation entities, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members.
Section 126K of the SISA outlines the potential offences and penalties for breaches. If a disqualified person knowingly acts in any capacity prohibited by the Act, they commit an offence that is punishable by up to two years imprisonment. This significant penalty underscores the seriousness of the contraventions and the importance of adhering to the Act's provisions. Additionally, the Act allows for the revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5) either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, section 344 provides recourse for individuals who wish to challenge their disqualification by requesting the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This ensures that there is a mechanism for review and potential redress for those affected by the disqualification decision.