NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Gregg Harris
MOUNT BARKER 5251
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 14 October 2020
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per John Macuz
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to establish a framework for the regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing issues of financial stability, trustee conduct, and the protection of superannuation benefits. This Act was introduced to address the problem of ensuring the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds, which are crucial for the retirement savings of many Australians. The policy objective is to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by enforcing standards of conduct and compliance among trustees and other responsible officers within the superannuation industry. The enactment of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was a significant step towards enhancing the regulatory environment for superannuation entities, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers adhere to strict standards to maintain the trust and confidence of superannuation fund members in the system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and regulation of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act specifically targets responsible officers of corporate trustees who are found to have contravened the legislation, with the potential for disqualification under subsection 126A(2) if the seriousness of the contraventions warrants such action. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of the SISA is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act. The Act does not specify particular exclusions or exemptions but allows for the extension of its application through subordinate instruments, which may include regulations or guidelines issued by the Commissioner of Taxation. The notice of disqualification provided to Gregg Harris serves to inform him that he has been disqualified from acting in any capacity related to the management of superannuation entities, and such disqualification may be subject to revocation under certain conditions or if an application is made by the disqualified person.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides several key provisions concerning the disqualification of individuals from acting in certain roles within the superannuation industry. Subsection 126A(6) of the SISA allows for the issuing of a notice of disqualification to an individual, which was executed in this case for Gregg Harris. The Act requires the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to issue such a notice when they are satisfied that the corporate trustee of a superannuation entity has contravened the Act and that the individual was a responsible officer at the time, and the seriousness of the contraventions warrants their disqualification (subsection 126A(2)). This notice of disqualification, as provided in the notice to Gregg Harris, serves to formally inform the individual that they have been disqualified from acting in specified capacities within the superannuation industry.
The SISA imposes certain obligations on the parties it governs, particularly those in responsible positions within superannuation entities. Responsible officers must ensure compliance with the SISA and its regulations to avoid any actions that could lead to the disqualification of themselves or their corporate trustees. Failure to adhere to these obligations can result in serious consequences, as outlined in the Act. In this case, Gregg Harris was found to have contravened the SISA while in his role as a responsible officer, leading to his disqualification.
The SISA also outlines various offences and penalties for breaches of its provisions. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act, or purport to act, as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that acts in these capacities. This offence carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. Additionally, the notice informs that the disqualification details will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette under subsection 126A(7), ensuring transparency and public awareness of such disqualifications. Gregg Harris is also advised that he can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if he is not satisfied with it, within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification, as per section 344 of the SISA.