NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Grant Thorsby Ross
Eastwood SA 5063
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, investment manager, custodian or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SIS Act.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 13 December 2013
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per
Christine Golenda
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to regulate the operations of the superannuation industry, ensuring the protection of superannuation benefits. The Act was introduced to address the need for robust oversight and management of superannuation funds, safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. The Parliament of Australia enacted the SIS Act to provide a legislative framework that ensures the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation system, focusing on the protection of members' benefits. The policy objective of the SIS Act is to maintain public confidence in the superannuation system by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers are fit and proper persons, thereby safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation fund members. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities, as demonstrated in the disqualification notice issued to Grant Thorsby Ross Eastwood.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation entities, which include trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of body corporates that manage these entities. The SIS Act operates at the Commonwealth level, extending its reach across Australia to ensure the proper administration and regulation of superannuation funds. The Act does not explicitly state exclusions, but it does provide for specific exemptions and thresholds in other sections not referenced here. The application and enforcement of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which may include regulations or rules made under the authority of the Act. This particular notice of disqualification is issued under subsection 126A(6) of the SIS Act, reflecting the legislative intent to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that only fit and proper persons manage these funds.
Key Provisions
The notice issued by Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), informs Grant Thorsby Ross Eastwood that he has been disqualified from serving as a trustee or responsible officer of a body corporate that manages superannuation entities. This disqualification stems from the delegate's determination, as per subsection 126A(3) of the SIS Act, that Grant Thorsby Ross Eastwood is not a fit and proper person to hold such positions. The notice specifies that the disqualification order takes immediate effect from the date of the notice, which is 13 December 2013.
The SIS Act imposes certain obligations on individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry. For trustees and responsible officers, the Act requires adherence to high standards of conduct and suitability, ensuring that they are fit to manage superannuation funds responsibly. The Act's provisions are designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system. Grant Thorsby Ross Eastwood's disqualification under the Act means he is no longer authorised to perform duties that involve managing or making decisions regarding superannuation funds.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the SIS Act can lead to significant consequences. The Act includes provisions for disqualification, as exercised in this case, and other potential penalties for breaches. For instance, subsection 126A(7) mandates that details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette, ensuring transparency and public accountability. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) of the Act allows for the revocation of the disqualification order either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified individual. Additionally, section 344 of the SIS Act provides a recourse for dissatisfied parties, allowing them to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided the request is made in writing and includes the reasons for the dissatisfaction.
In summary, the notice and subsequent disqualification under the SIS Act are significant measures to enforce compliance and maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry. The Act sets clear standards and imposes obligations on trustees and responsible officers, while also providing mechanisms for review and potential revocation of disqualification orders. The consequences for non-compliance, including public notice and potential penalties, underscore the importance of adhering to the Act's requirements.