NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Graeme BALDWIN
CARDIFF SOUTH NSW 2285
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 29 January 2020
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Ian Ross
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry. This legislation was introduced to ensure that superannuation entities operate with integrity and that trustees and other key personnel are fit and proper individuals. The overarching policy objective of the Act is to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by promoting efficient, honest and responsible management of superannuation funds. The Act provides a framework for the regulation of the superannuation industry, including the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unsuitable to manage superannuation funds due to serious misconduct or breaches of the Act. This legal mechanism is essential in maintaining the trust and confidence of the public in the superannuation system, ensuring that fund managers adhere to high standards of conduct and accountability.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and operation of superannuation funds in Australia, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act’s jurisdictional reach extends to the Commonwealth, impacting entities and individuals operating within the national superannuation industry. The Act aims to ensure the integrity and proper administration of superannuation funds by imposing qualifications and disqualifications on those involved. Specifically, under the Act, a person may be disqualified if they contravene the Act’s provisions, with the seriousness of the contravention determining the grounds for disqualification. This disqualification prohibits the person from acting in certain capacities related to superannuation entities. The Act also provides mechanisms for the revocation of disqualifications and avenues for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides several key provisions, particularly those concerning disqualification of individuals from certain roles within the superannuation industry. Section 126A(1) empowers a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify an individual who has contravened the SISA, and subsection 126A(6) mandates that a formal notice of this disqualification be issued to the affected person. This notice, as in the case of Graeme Baldwin, is to inform the disqualified individual that their disqualification has been enforced due to a breach of the SISA. This disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice.
Under the SISA, the disqualification imposes significant obligations and requirements on the affected individual. For instance, section 126K specifically prohibits a disqualified person from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or from being a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that holds such roles. These roles are critical in managing and overseeing the investments and funds within superannuation entities, and the prohibition ensures that individuals who have breached the SISA do not continue to manage these important financial responsibilities.
Failing to comply with these provisions can lead to serious consequences. According to section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the prohibited roles. The penalty for committing this offence can be severe, with a maximum of two years in jail. This demonstrates the seriousness with which the SISA treats breaches and the importance of adhering to the regulations governing the superannuation industry.
Additionally, there are provisions for potential revocation of the disqualification. Subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the disqualification to be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner's delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This provides a pathway for individuals to potentially regain their eligibility to act in the roles outlined in the SISA, subject to meeting certain conditions or demonstrating compliance with the law. For those dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, section 344 offers an avenue to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision, provided the request is made in writing and includes reasons for the perceived error in the decision.