NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – GORDON WILSON
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Gordon Wilson
APPIN NSW 2560
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 3 August 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate and oversee the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the industry operates efficiently, economically, and in a manner that maintains public confidence. The Act was introduced to address issues such as the mismanagement of funds, inadequate governance, and lack of transparency in the superannuation industry. The SISA is administered by the Parliament of Australia, with the objective of maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. Under the SISA, the Commissioner of Taxation is empowered to disqualify individuals who have acted in a manner that undermines the objectives of the Act, such as being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that has contravened the Act, thereby safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act provides a framework for overseeing the conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians to ensure compliance with the law and to protect the superannuation savings of Australians.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to responsible officers within corporate trustees of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with superannuation laws and regulations. This act extends its reach across the Commonwealth of Australia and is enforced by the Commissioner of Taxation. A disqualifying notice under the Act can be issued when there are serious contraventions of the Act by the corporate trustee, with the responsible officer at the time being Gordon Wilson in this instance. The disqualification takes immediate effect, barring the named individual from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with serious implications including potential criminal penalties for continued involvement. Subordinate instruments and provisions within the Act allow for the revocation of such disqualifications under specific conditions, such as upon application by the disqualified person or by the delegate's own initiative. Furthermore, the Act provides a recourse for those affected by the disqualification, allowing for a reconsideration request to the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
Under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), the main operative sections involved in this disqualification notice include subsection 126A(6) which mandates the delivery of the notice, and subsection 126A(2) which outlines the grounds for disqualification. The notice informs Gordon Wilson that he has been disqualified as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee due to repeated contraventions of the SISA by the corporate trustee, with the seriousness of these contraventions warranting his disqualification. This disqualification takes immediate effect as stated in the notice.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on Gordon Wilson. As a responsible officer, he must ensure compliance with the SISA and maintain high standards of governance within the superannuation entities under his oversight. His responsibilities would typically include monitoring the corporate trustee’s adherence to legal and regulatory requirements, ensuring financial integrity, and safeguarding the interests of superannuation members.
Failing to comply with the disqualification order can result in serious consequences. According to section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a corporate trustee. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years in jail. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the disqualification to be revoked, either on the initiative of the delegate or upon written application by Gordon Wilson himself.
For those affected by the disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. If Gordon Wilson is not satisfied with the decision, he can request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should include the reasons why he believes the decision is incorrect. This provides an avenue for legal redress and potential reversal of the disqualification, should it be deemed unjust.