NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – GLENN DELANEY
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
GLENN DELANEY
WODONGA VIC 3690
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) and 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 31 March 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the proper management and supervision of superannuation funds, addressing the need for robust regulatory oversight within the superannuation industry. The Act, enacted by the Australian Parliament, aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by establishing regulatory standards and oversight mechanisms. This legislation was introduced to address gaps in the regulation of superannuation trustees and responsible officers, ensuring they are fit and proper persons capable of managing superannuation funds responsibly. The enactment of the SISA was driven by the need to safeguard the financial interests of superannuation members, promoting confidence in the superannuation system and preventing misconduct by industry participants.
The notice of disqualification for Glenn Delaney under the SISA highlights the Act's role in maintaining the integrity of the superannuation industry. The notice, issued by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, indicates that Glenn Delaney has been disqualified from acting as a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity due to contraventions of the SISA and being deemed unfit for such roles. This disqualification underscores the SISA's objective to prevent individuals who have demonstrated unsuitability from participating in the management of superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of fund members and maintaining the overall integrity of the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation entities within Australia. This legislation imposes a duty of care and professional conduct on trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities, ensuring that they operate within the regulatory framework designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act extends its reach across the Commonwealth, thereby applying to all superannuation entities and their officers, regardless of where they are physically located within Australia. The SISA provides mechanisms for disqualifying individuals from acting as trustees or responsible officers if they are deemed unfit or have contravened the Act’s provisions, as evidenced by the disqualification of Glenn Delaney. Notably, the Act also stipulates that disqualified individuals cannot act in the specified capacities for any superannuation entity, with significant penalties for non-compliance. The disqualification process, including potential revocation, is detailed within the Act, and any affected party has the right to request reconsideration of the decision within a specified timeframe.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains specific provisions for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(1) and 126A(3), a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to disqualify an individual, such as Glenn Delaney, from being a trustee, a responsible officer, or holding a similar role if they have contravened the SISA or are not deemed fit and proper for the role. This notice, issued under subsection 126A(6), informs Glenn Delaney of his disqualification, which takes immediate effect. The delegate, Emma Rosenzweig, has determined that Glenn Delaney's past contraventions of the SISA, along with their seriousness, justify his disqualification.
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals who have been disqualified, as outlined in section 126K. A disqualified person is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or a responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This prohibition is a critical requirement under the Act, and failure to comply can result in serious legal consequences. The Act mandates that details of the disqualification are to be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public notification of such decisions.
Breaching the Act's provisions can lead to significant penalties. Under section 126K, a disqualified person who knowingly continues to act in a prohibited capacity commits an offence, which carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of disqualification orders. Additionally, the Act provides avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of the disqualification, as detailed under subsection 126A(5) and section 344, respectively, allowing for both proactive revocation by the delegate and written applications by the disqualified individual.