NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Gina Bradley
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Gina Bradley
REDCLIFFE WA 6104
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 15 June 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bharti Ben
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a framework for the regulation and supervision of superannuation trustees, investment managers, and custodians. This legislation was introduced to address the need for robust oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have acted in a manner that justifies their removal from roles within the superannuation industry. The policy objective is to ensure that the trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities act with integrity and competence, thereby safeguarding the financial wellbeing of superannuation fund members. The Commonwealth Parliament enacted this Act to create a structured regulatory environment that deters misconduct and ensures accountability within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, this legislation targets responsible officers of corporate trustees who oversee superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. The Act operates on a Commonwealth level, thereby exerting its influence across the entire nation, including states and territories. The notice of disqualification, as illustrated by the case of Gina Bradley, indicates that the Act can disqualify individuals from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities if they have been found to contravene the Act’s provisions. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance and is subject to potential revocation under specific conditions. Furthermore, the Act provides a recourse mechanism for those who wish to challenge the disqualification decision within a stipulated timeframe. Notably, any disqualified person found to contravene the Act by acting in a prohibited capacity faces severe penalties, including imprisonment.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes a mechanism for disqualifying individuals from being involved in the management of superannuation entities, specifically under section 126A. In this case, Gina Bradley has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA. This disqualification was issued by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, because Gina was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities that contravened the SISA on one or more occasions. The disqualification is effective from the date the notice is issued.
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals like Gina who are disqualified. For example, under section 126K, a disqualified person is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or being a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles. This prohibition is intended to prevent individuals who have been found to have contravened the SISA from continuing to manage superannuation funds. Breach of these provisions can lead to serious consequences, including criminal penalties.
Breaching the provisions that prevent a disqualified person from managing superannuation entities is a criminal offence under section 126K of the SISA. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment. This highlights the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance with disqualification orders. The Act also provides some avenues for recourse, such as the possibility of revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5), either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified person.
Additionally, if Gina is affected by the decision and believes it to be incorrect, she has the right to ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision under section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and should include the reasons why she thinks the decision is wrong. This provision ensures that there is a mechanism for challenging the disqualification if there are grounds to believe it was made in error.