NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – GILLIAN HILL – 24 September 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
GILLIAN HILL
CONDONG NSW 2484
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 24 September 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nichola Wood-Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to establish a regulatory framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and the rights of fund members. The Act was introduced to address the problem of inadequate oversight and management within the superannuation industry, aiming to safeguard the financial interests of members by enforcing compliance with regulatory standards. In the case of Gillian Hill, the Act was utilised to disqualify her from acting as a responsible officer due to her involvement with a corporate trustee that contravened the Act on multiple occasions. The policy objective behind this disqualification is to deter and prevent individuals associated with serious breaches of superannuation laws from continuing to manage funds, thereby upholding the integrity of the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees within the superannuation industry in Australia, including individuals and entities that manage or oversee superannuation funds. The Act operates on a Commonwealth level, extending its jurisdictional reach across the entire country to ensure uniform regulation of the superannuation industry. This legislation specifically targets the conduct of responsible officers who may have contravened its provisions, resulting in potential disqualification from managing superannuation entities. Exclusions and exemptions are generally not explicitly stated within the Act itself but may be defined through subordinate instruments or specific provisions addressing particular circumstances or entities. The disqualification process, as highlighted in the notice to Gillian Hill, is stringent and involves a thorough assessment of the severity and frequency of any contraventions by the corporate trustee, thereby ensuring that only those with repeated or serious breaches are disqualified. Additionally, any disqualified person found to be acting in a restricted capacity post-disqualification faces significant penalties, including imprisonment, underscoring the importance of compliance with the Act.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions for disqualifying individuals from certain roles within superannuation entities. Section 126A(2) provides the grounds for disqualification, which can occur if a responsible officer of a corporate trustee contravenes the Act in a way that is serious enough to warrant such action. The notice of disqualification, as stated in subsection 126A(6), informs the individual that they have been disqualified, and this action takes effect immediately. This notice was issued to Gillian Hill, indicating that she has been disqualified under the authority of the Commissioner of Taxation.
The Act imposes several obligations on individuals and entities it governs. Those serving as responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with the SISA, which includes adhering to all regulatory requirements and standards set forth by the legislation. Failure to do so can lead to disqualification. The responsible officer must also be aware of any contraventions occurring under their watch and take steps to address them to avoid disqualification.
Breaching the terms of the disqualification is itself an offence under the SISA. Section 126K specifies that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such a body. The maximum penalty for this offence is a two-year jail term, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act treats these violations. Additionally, the disqualification notice, once issued, will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public accountability.
For those who feel their disqualification is unjust, section 344 of the SISA allows for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner. Any request for reconsideration must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must outline the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either by the authority that issued it or upon the written application of the disqualified individual, providing a potential pathway for reinstatement under certain conditions.