NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
GEOFFREY MOSSMAN
CAMDEN NSW 2570
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 December 2017
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Robert Moon
Acting Director, Engagement & Assurance VIC/TAS
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
- trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
- responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address significant governance and regulatory gaps within the superannuation industry, particularly to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was designed to provide a robust regulatory framework to ensure the proper administration, management, and oversight of superannuation funds, aiming to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The SISA addresses issues such as ensuring that trustees and other key personnel act in the best interests of fund members, managing conflicts of interest, and enforcing compliance with the law to prevent misuse or misappropriation of funds. The policy objective behind the Act is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation members by promoting responsible and ethical conduct within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, the Act imposes obligations and restrictions on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across all states and territories of Australia. The Act is administered by the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring a consistent regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation funds. The notice of disqualification, as exemplified in the case of Geoffrey Mossman, is a mechanism through which the Commissioner of Taxation enforces compliance with the SISA. Exclusions and exemptions from the Act are generally limited, with certain categories of superannuation entities potentially qualifying for specific relief. The application and scope of the Act can be extended or clarified through subordinate instruments, allowing for adjustments to regulatory requirements as necessary. The Act provides for both civil and criminal penalties, including disqualification from managing superannuation funds and potential imprisonment for serious breaches.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Geoffrey Mossman that he has been disqualified due to contraventions of the SISA. The disqualification is effective from the date of the notice, which is 12 December 2017. This action is taken by James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, who is satisfied that the nature and seriousness of the contraventions justify the disqualification.
The SISA imposes specific obligations on individuals and entities involved with superannuation entities. For instance, section 126K mandates that a disqualified person must not act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, nor be a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds such roles. Failure to comply with these obligations can lead to serious legal consequences, including criminal charges. The notice serves as an official record of the disqualification, which is a punitive measure intended to uphold the integrity of the superannuation industry.
Breaching the disqualification order by acting in any capacity as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer, is an offence under the SISA. As per section 126K, a person who knowingly contravenes this prohibition faces the severe penalty of up to two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the seriousness with which the legislation treats such breaches, aiming to deter individuals from engaging in activities that could jeopardise the interests of superannuation fund members.
The notice also highlights potential pathways for the disqualification to be reviewed or revoked. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, section 344 provides a mechanism for Geoffrey Mossman to request a reconsideration of the decision if he is dissatisfied with it. This reconsideration must be requested in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should include the reasons for believing the decision is incorrect. This process ensures that there is a formal avenue for appeal, providing a check on the administrative action taken under the SISA.