NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Geoff Boneham - 9 July 2026
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Geoff Boneham
LUGARNO NSW 2210
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1).
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 9 July 2026
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Deepa Fernando
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act establishes a framework for the supervision and regulation of superannuation funds, their trustees, and other related entities, ensuring that they operate in the best interests of their members. One of the critical provisions of the SISA is the ability to disqualify individuals from participating in the administration of superannuation entities if they have contravened the provisions of the Act. This legislative tool is intended to maintain the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system by preventing those who have acted contrary to the law from continuing to manage superannuation funds. The notice of disqualification provided to Geoff Boneham under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA exemplifies the Act's objective to enforce compliance and uphold the standards expected within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to various individuals and entities within the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act’s jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring uniform standards and supervision of the superannuation industry nationwide. The Act’s scope includes prohibiting disqualified individuals from acting in certain capacities within superannuation entities, with significant penalties for breaches. Notably, the Act allows for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its provisions, with the disqualification taking immediate effect upon issuance. Disqualification details are mandated to be published in the Federal Register of Legislation, thereby ensuring transparency and public awareness. The Act also provides avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of disqualification, allowing for procedural fairness.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions that address the disqualification of individuals from participating in superannuation activities. Section 126A(1) of the SISA allows for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act, with section 126A(6) mandating the provision of a notice of disqualification to the affected individual. In this case, Geoff Boneham has been disqualified under this section as a result of his contraventions of the SISA, as confirmed by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, Ben Kelly. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon the issuance of the notice, as stated in the document dated 9 July 2026.
The SISA imposes a number of obligations and requirements on entities and individuals governed by the Act. For example, section 126K specifies that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of such an entity. This provision is designed to ensure that individuals who have been found to have contravened the SISA do not continue to have a role in managing superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of fund members.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the SISA can result in serious consequences. As per section 126K, the maximum penalty for knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity after being disqualified is two years imprisonment. This serves as a deterrent against non-compliance and underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its provisions. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either by the authority on its own initiative or in response to a written application from the disqualified person.
The document also provides recourse for those who are dissatisfied with the disqualification decision. Section 344 of the SISA allows for a request to the Commissioner to reconsider the decision, provided that the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision. This mechanism ensures that there is a formal process in place for addressing grievances and potentially overturning the disqualification if the affected party can demonstrate that the decision was erroneous. This provision reinforces the principles of fairness and due process within the regulatory framework established by the SISA.