NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Gavin Rider - 23 February 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Gavin Rider
NARRE WARREN EAST VIC 3804
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 February 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities adhere to stringent standards and legal obligations. This Act was introduced to address the need for effective oversight and accountability within the superannuation sector, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by preventing misconduct and mismanagement. The SISA was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and its policy objective is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by imposing strict regulatory measures and penalties on those who fail to comply with the Act's provisions. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals who contravene its provisions, with the seriousness of the contravention determining the grounds for disqualification.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation entities within Australia. Specifically, the Act applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, responsible officers, and body corporates that act in these capacities for superannuation entities. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth statute. The Act's provisions extend to ensuring the proper management and administration of superannuation funds, with significant consequences for those who contravene its requirements. Notably, the Act allows for the disqualification of individuals who have breached its provisions, as evidenced in the case of Gavin Rider. Such disqualifications are enforced by the Commissioner of Taxation and can be published as Notifiable Instruments in the Federal Register of Legislation. The Act also includes provisions for the revocation of disqualifications and allows for reconsideration of decisions by the Commissioner within a specified timeframe. The Act’s stringent measures and penalties underscore its importance in maintaining the integrity and proper functioning of Australia’s superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this notice pertain to subsections 126A(1) and 126A(6). Under subsection 126A(1), the Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to disqualify a person from acting in certain roles within the superannuation industry if they find that the person has contravened the Act. The notice given to Gavin Rider under subsection 126A(6) informs him that he has been disqualified based on the Commissioner’s satisfaction that Gavin has contravened the Act on one or more occasions, and the seriousness of these contraventions justifies his disqualification.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on Gavin Rider, as well as on any other person who has been disqualified under its provisions. For instance, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person who knows they are disqualified to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds such roles. This means that Gavin Rider, now disqualified, cannot participate in any capacity that involves managing or overseeing superannuation funds, which are critical roles within the industry.
There are significant consequences for breaching these provisions. According to section 126K, any disqualified person who knowingly continues to act in a prohibited capacity can be subject to criminal penalties. The maximum penalty for this offence is a two-year jail term, illustrating the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of disqualification orders. Additionally, the notice of disqualification will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, making it publicly available and serving as a formal record of Gavin Rider’s disqualification.
Finally, the Act provides avenues for recourse if a disqualified person believes the decision is unjust. Under section 344, Gavin Rider has the right to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving notice. This request must be made in writing and should outline the reasons why he believes the decision is incorrect. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) allows for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by Gavin Rider.