NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Gary Keith Bill
Southport QLD 4215
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 25 September 2017
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Colleen Shelton
Director Victoria/Tasmania
Superannuation – Engagement & Assurance
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to provide robust regulatory oversight of the superannuation industry, addressing significant concerns about the adequacy of existing controls and the potential for mismanagement or misconduct. This Act aims to ensure the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation system by establishing stringent standards for the conduct of trustees and responsible officers. The policy objective behind the Act is to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those who manage and oversee these funds do so with the highest standards of probity and competence. In the case of Gary Keith Bill, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation has exercised the powers under this Act to disqualify him from acting as a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, finding him not to be a fit and proper person to hold such a position. This action is intended to uphold the Act’s overarching goal of maintaining the trust and confidence of superannuation fund members in the system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) governs the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to serve as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities, which include superannuation funds and certain related entities. This Act applies to any individual who has been found not to be a fit and proper person to manage or oversee superannuation funds in Australia. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, and it applies to all superannuation entities across the country. The disqualification process under the Act can be initiated by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation and involves a notice being issued to the individual concerned, as seen in the case of Gary Keith Bill from Southport, Queensland. The Act also provides for the publication of such disqualification notices in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette to ensure transparency and public awareness. The disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance, and the individual is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of any superannuation entity, with significant penalties, including up to two years imprisonment, for non-compliance. The Act allows for the revocation of disqualification either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, the Act provides a recourse mechanism for individuals to seek a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides for the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to serve as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. In this instance, subsection 126A(3) of the SISA has been invoked, which empowers a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify an individual if they are not deemed a fit and proper person. This decision is communicated to the individual through a formal notice, such as the one addressed to Gary Keith Bill, which specifies that the disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance (subsection 126A(6)).
The SISA imposes several obligations on the disqualified individual, such as Gary Keith Bill. Most importantly, once disqualified, he is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or being a responsible officer of a body corporate involved in such capacities (section 126K). This legal restriction aims to safeguard the integrity of the superannuation industry by ensuring that only suitable individuals manage superannuation funds. Failure to adhere to this disqualification can result in serious legal consequences.
Breaching the disqualification order by acting in any of the prohibited roles is a criminal offence under section 126K of the SISA. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years in jail, highlighting the seriousness with which the law treats such violations. Additionally, the disqualification notice informs that details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, serving as a public record of the individual's disqualification.
The SISA also provides avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, if Gary Keith Bill is dissatisfied with the decision, he can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as stipulated in section 344 of the SISA. This provision ensures that there is a formal process in place for addressing grievances and potentially reversing the disqualification if new information or circumstances warrant it.