NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Gael Dorothy MacDonald
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Gael Dorothy MacDonald
BUNDALL QLD 4217
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 30 January 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the proper management and oversight of superannuation funds in Australia, addressing the need for robust regulatory mechanisms to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced to establish a regulatory framework that provides for the supervision of trustees, fund managers, and other entities involved in the superannuation industry, ensuring they adhere to strict standards of conduct and accountability. The SISA was enacted by the Australian Parliament with the policy objective of safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by preventing misconduct and mismanagement within the industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have been responsible officers in corporate trustees that have contravened the Act, as demonstrated by the disqualification notice issued to Gael Dorothy MacDonald on 30 January 2023 by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. This notice highlights the seriousness of such contraventions and the stringent measures in place to enforce compliance within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees managing superannuation entities, ensuring they adhere to the regulatory standards governing the superannuation industry. The Act has Commonwealth jurisdiction, extending its reach across Australia and applying to any entity involved in the administration of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act imposes significant consequences for non-compliance, including the potential for disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its provisions while serving as responsible officers. Disqualification under the Act is a serious measure that bars the individual from acting in any capacity related to the management of superannuation entities, and it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue in such roles. The Act also provides for the publication of disqualification notices and allows for the revocation of disqualifications under certain conditions. Entities and individuals within the superannuation sector must ensure strict compliance to avoid facing the stringent penalties and reputational damage associated with non-compliance.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains various provisions aimed at ensuring the proper management and oversight of superannuation entities. Specifically, subsection 126A(2) allows for the disqualification of an individual from acting in a responsible capacity if certain conditions are met. In this case, Gael Dorothy MacDonald has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) due to the contravention of SISA by the corporate trustee, for which she was a responsible officer at the time. The disqualification is effective immediately upon notice, as stated in subsection 126A(6).
Under the Act, responsible officers of corporate trustees are subject to stringent oversight and accountability measures. They must ensure compliance with all relevant provisions of the SISA, including fiduciary duties, investment standards, and reporting requirements. The obligations of responsible officers are designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and beneficiaries. Failure to adhere to these obligations can result in serious consequences, including disqualification from managing superannuation entities.
Breaches of the SISA can result in significant penalties. For instance, section 126K of the Act imposes a criminal offence for disqualified persons to act in any capacity related to superannuation entities, such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness of non-compliance. Additionally, the disqualification itself can be revoked under subsection 126A(5), either at the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified individual.
Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the disqualification decision. If Gael Dorothy MacDonald is dissatisfied with the decision, she can request the Commissioner to reconsider it within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should include the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal avenue for appeal and rectification of what the individual considers to be an erroneous decision.